80 Comments
- FeargusMcDuff, on 10/11/2007, -3/+60Not very funny?
- jiveturkeyblues, on 10/10/2007, -3/+15none of those were funny. at all.
- tmjoen, on 10/10/2007, -1/+13no < head >?
- fungule, on 10/10/2007, -1/+10that was funny in the same way e-mail forwards are funny, er...
- tycy, on 10/10/2007, -7/+15and the < body > too :)
- upernikaw, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8buried for being about 10 years old
- muniak, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7"Anyone can HTML now!!" Is stupid.
< br > made me snort >, - EXreaction, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6href is not an html tag.
- cliffhanger407, on 10/10/2007, -4/+10I'm making it my mission to bury all of these comments that I can find on digg.
- shinynew, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4NO JUST STOP!
- EXreaction, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Stop spamming you jackass.
- UtopiaInTheSky, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Most of these comments look fake. Someone is buying Diggs to promote their blog?
- FatalEntity, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Let me give you a tip. Don't go deep into your life story on a subject when posting a comment on digg. Especially when your comment has little to do with the actual story.
- QuickeningYak, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3< retarded >
that project
< /retarded > - shinynew, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4SHUT UP!
- KillTheRhythm, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3No it didn't.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Totally moronic...
- EXreaction, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Very bad sarcasm.
- manitoba98xp, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It wasn't terribly clear, but I believe @exomni was referring to the "anchor" tag. Like this: < a href="...">< /a>
- adooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2The story was worthless also.
- iFungus, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3*Spam!*
- Julz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2im doing the same, GET A JOB HIPPY
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Yep.
- adooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1< gay />
- webtroy, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1dugg for ... < BR >
- Firehed, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1You need to work on self-closing tags, unless you're referring to yourself/your post as gay.
- adooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1*****
- Obligation, on 10/10/2007, -5/+6Ok, most of them weren't funny, but I laughed out loud at < br> .
- adooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Ok, but I think the polite way to bring that up would be "So who wants to hear about how I learned html? Anyone? What do you say?"
Something like that. - antdude, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/2262/firefoxay8 ... is a cool image. Is there a bigger version of it?
- ookxtreme, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1wtf
- iFungus, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Way to promote your blog...
- lcmatt, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3By stealing other peoples designs? Also don't think that your some almighty designer just because you can use Notepad.
- adooga, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1True. Probably should have used <! -- gay -- > anyway.
- shinynew, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2nope.
- shinynew, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1god damnit whats up with this story all the comments are worthless.
- Nanobe, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1There sure is a lot of invalid markup in there. Since when does the base element have an end tag?
- TenebrousX, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1That's the dumbest way of learning. Instead of understanding what the tags mean, you just learn what they do. It would be like learning how to differentiate functions without learning that the derivative is the slope of the function.
Not to mention the terribly coded pages that you must have studied. - antdude, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1More: http://haha.nu/misc/html-tags-illustrated/ and http://flickr.com/groups/htmljokes/pool/ from http://www.boingboing.net/2007/02/23/html_tags_ill ... and http://aqfl.net/?q=node/4638 ...
- joel.smith, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2i love the <link> photo...
- Br0wn, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Was that supposed to be funny or clever? Closest I came to laughing was the < br >.
- lcmatt, on 10/25/2007, -3/+3Digg down - replied to wrong comment.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2Buried as spam.
And I reported nutsandmilk for every comment. Dumbass. - antdude, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1You have no sense of humour. :P
- MetisAlfa, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0didn't really learn anything there... as for laughing... ;-P
- antdude, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1You just don't have a sense of humour. I thought it was amusing. Not hilarious funny, but amusing.
- mbup, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1pic 3 = boobs
- DarkMeld, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1Im having trouble getting past
- Antixian, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2to everyone that thinks that was funny....you're all gay morons. it sucked.
- ridd1e, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1And with deprecated HTML-2.0-ish tags.
This is funny: http://images.google.com/images?q=html+***** (NSFW) -
Show 51 - 68 of 68 discussions



What is Digg?
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our