What is Digg?Sponsored by HowLifeWorks
How Smart Guys Keep Their Faces Looking Young view!
howlifeworks.com - Why men have finally started to use certain anti-aging skin care products...
641 Comments
- sonofblacula, on 03/28/2008, -12/+280With highly advanced Photoshop engines.
- NateDog, on 03/28/2008, -13/+256Some nifty photoshop skills I'm sure, but still, it's always fun to imagine ... "what if it's real!?" :)
- danielrh9, on 03/28/2008, -3/+206Crap. It's Xenu. We should have listened.
- KenSPT, on 03/28/2008, -1/+165I miss the days when I was a kid and "UFO Pictures" were nothing more than bulbs of lights in the sky.
Now we get close up, clear, images of hovering crafts. Kids these days don't know how good they have it. - iehova, on 03/28/2008, -6/+161This picture was analyzed on the History Channel show "UFO Hunters." They couldn't prove it was a UFO, more likely a Photoshop job.
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -27/+170These things are showing up everywhere. And they ARE NOT a publicity stunt for Halo 3. More photos at this link:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1402&categor ... - Falldog, on 03/28/2008, -1/+90Ah, remember the days before photoshop?
http://www.hufos.net/images/maybe_a_fake_ufo.jpg
http://www.imgdump.info/img7697.search.htm - nahsrocketeer75, on 03/28/2008, -9/+97Just stop already. I love a good UFO yarn as much as the next skeptic, but they shouldn't get one second's worth of mainstream press attention without a gap-toothed farmer claiming credit for the photos.
- DrDragun, on 03/28/2008, -10/+94Damn I gotta find the article on Digg when these pics were up about 1-2 years ago. They were debunked either as a Halo 3 viral marketing or as someone's prank. Much better than these photos was an incredibly detailed fake science report from a secret researcher at a government facility. Beautiful artwork.
What gave it away, among other things, was the writing on the spacecraft. The writing is a mixture between Arabic and Halo covenant language. - Orsenfelt, on 03/28/2008, -3/+66It's a weather balloon people, Calm down.
- Brownds, on 03/28/2008, -0/+60Quick hide your anuses! That thing looks painful.
- SickMonkey, on 03/28/2008, -6/+65U.F.Photo Shopped!
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -2/+60I can't wait for the new X-Files film!
- BruisedGhost, on 03/28/2008, -4/+61dugg for steampunk UFO's
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -2/+58---------"Some UFO researchers believe the pictures show an extraterrestrial drone hovering over the city of Capitola."---------
Yeah, and what "UFO researchers" would those be? Names? Credentials?
---------"However, no one has taken credit for snapping the photographs."------------------
Oh, Nevermind! - borez, on 03/28/2008, -12/+65Same thing spotted over Croyden England
http://images.elfwood.com/art/k/e/kelesaii/flying_ ... - filemeaway, on 03/28/2008, -3/+46Original observer pics:
http://www.paranormalfiles.co.uk/rajman1977_photos ... - wedgemartin, on 03/28/2008, -6/+49Or an Infinite Improbability Drive
- KenSPT, on 03/28/2008, -2/+42Not for nothing, UFO Hunters almost always comes to "no conclusion". That show is the epitome of "researchers" running on a treadmill.
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -13/+51So clearly faked......
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -7/+45It was viral marketing for Alienware, not Halo.
- kinseyincanada, on 03/28/2008, -23/+59wasn't this just a PR stunt for the release of Halo 3 a while back?
- had3l, on 03/28/2008, -1/+37It's also very interesting how the design of UFOs get cooler and more modern as time goes by...
- norman619, on 03/28/2008, -2/+32Sorry but that's BS. These are the only ones. If you watch the video it's so obviously fake (CG). It's always disappointing how easily people are taken in by crap like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5glJ3X_Ufco
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xXdIJmjQFE&feature ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIfr12XhrZE&feature ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJiCxWUlgcY&feature ... - doomeyes, on 03/28/2008, -2/+31It looks like a flying crop circle.
- mogebier, on 03/28/2008, -5/+33OH SNAP!!
I need to remember to turn on my cloaking device next time I go out. I had no idea it was off when I went out for Pizza. - jbmcb, on 03/28/2008, -5/+31>please PROVE that it's not real if you disagree with the material on that site
You don't seem to understand basic scientific theory. You cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof, especially for extraordinary claims, is on the claimant. If you're trying to prove UFOs are real, you're going to need a LOT of hard evidence, not just pictures and testimonials.
> testimony under oath from extremely "high quality" witnesses.
What makes them "high quality"? Unless they are a trained Air Force or Navy spotter, what in their military or scientific training makes them experts on observing and identifying aircraft?
I looked at the site to try and find some of this irrefutable evidence, but it looks like you have to buy the book or video, or pay $5 to access the special witness section of the website. No thanks. - Waiting2awake, on 03/28/2008, -5/+30how do you prove something is unidentified?
Agreed it is probably a photoshop(Physics FTW) but I can't see how you can prove that it is something we don't know? You know? - inactive, on 03/28/2008, -6/+30These are the same viral marketing pics from a year or so ago, what the hell does NBC think these are recent?
- inactive, on 03/28/2008, -13/+37Omg.....this is so fake...
- inajeep, on 03/28/2008, -6/+30I remember it to, it was just before Halo 3 was launched.
- Shogi, on 03/28/2008, -5/+29Those "photos" of the alien technology are obvious 3d renders, albeit damn good ones.
- SkippyDoorknob, on 03/28/2008, -0/+23In this case: "pics and it still didn't happen"
- Harabeck, on 03/28/2008, -7/+30This is so rediculous. If such craft were appearing in the way these photos suggest, there would be more pics and videos for one. And second, they wouldnt be near as clear as they appear, theyre too good. The first thing I thought when I saw them was that it was definately photoshopped, and all of the pics have similar quality.
- Orion682, on 03/28/2008, -4/+25http://www.dailygrail.com/node/5594
http://www.alienware.com/Microsite_Pages/declassif ...
Get over yourself. It was a viral marketing campaign using shoddy 3DS Max work and an image editor, and anyone who's worked with 3D modeling and visual effects can tell you likewise. We believe what we want to believe, but that does not make it any more true. - inactive, on 03/28/2008, -1/+22Even the UFO hunters show on history channel has said those are likely to be CGI renders.
- filemeaway, on 03/28/2008, -27/+46These sightings have been identified as technology reverse engineered in the eighties, part of the DoD CARET program. more pics and documentation..
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/ - inactive, on 03/28/2008, -4/+23That is fake. Viral marketing for Alienware.
- ehrlich, on 03/28/2008, -3/+21These say in their matadata:
Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows - wedgemartin, on 03/28/2008, -19/+37Dugg for being a sincere crackpot.
- Harabeck, on 03/28/2008, -5/+21The entire object is always the same focus in every pic, even if some of the craft should extend outside of the focus.
- Elliuotatar, on 03/28/2008, -1/+16They may no be viral marketing, but they're fake. All you have to do is look at how the lighting on the ships differs from the lighting on their surroundings. The telephone pole for example has boards with very dark undersides. But the undersides of the ship are well lit. Also the lighting on the light colored things on the poles has a much harder edge to it with highlights that are more blown out. And then there's the fact that if the ship were huge, rather than a model, then it would have to be quite distant. Yet it is no more blurry than the power lines in the foreground.
And why the color tint, and the red halos? And all the noise? This is clearly a bright day, the exposure time should be short enough not to have motion blur from camera shake. They can't be following the craft because the craft itself displays no motion blur other than that which is on the rest of the scene. So it must be still. So why is the camera moving at all?
These photos are fake fake fake. I only had to glance at them for a moment to tell. Anyone who does graphics work would be able to spot it. - inajeep, on 03/28/2008, -3/+18Anonymous source? If you had such hi-res photos why would you release them anonymously. I won't believe it till an alien lands in my yard, gets out and shakes hands with me. Till then, these photos are rendered very well. Especially the one with the thin wires/rods mounted in a circle pointing straight up that are nice and clear in the distance from the trees which happen to be beyond the DOF (depth of field)
- swrostmore, on 03/28/2008, -1/+15MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) reports that this is a fake.
"Marc D’Antonio–CGI Expert –FX Models
“Those of us in the (CGI) community can look at and immediately spot fakery. I have to say that this one is not actually even a GOOD fake.”
“In one of the images, you can see that the faker used something called ‘radiosity’to render the images. The technique allows for more realistic images and makes things look very good, as if lit by the sun in this case. You can see classic radiosity render artifacts in the dark shadow areas of the CG craft. They show up as mottling in the shadows instead of smooth transitions.” - directive0, on 03/28/2008, -1/+15UFOs are TOTALLY real. Yesterday I saw some kind of plane flying by at a high altitude... but I couldn't really make out what kind or who it belonged to. I was totally unable to identify that flying object.
- praisethelard, on 06/06/2008, -1/+15Yeah, seems like it was for Alienware: http://www.dailygrail.com/node/5594
- nekochan, on 03/28/2008, -1/+15he is. because he can tell by the pixels and he's seen a lot of photoshops in his time.
- LLLSecretChimp, on 03/28/2008, -1/+14"how do you prove something is unidentified? " Easy, by failing to identify it. Proving something is unidentifiable is a lot harder.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 652 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
