What is Digg?Sponsored by Threadless
136 Comments
- presidentraygun, on 05/11/2009, -2/+100That's why I tie my babies down to the hood with high quality bungee cords.
- Ysabetwordsmith, on 05/11/2009, -9/+92Maybe "people like this" reproduce because America is into abstinence-only programs and anti-choice legislation. Not everyone is good parent material, and people who recognize they are not should be given FREE BIRTH CONTROL.
- Haoie, on 05/11/2009, -3/+44Only have kids if you're actually going to take care of them, OK?
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -1/+42BEST THUMBNAIL EVER.
- yocouchdigga, on 05/12/2009, -0/+39Dad?
- mrpunman, on 05/12/2009, -1/+36I can't believe she fled the scene. How ***** up can a mom be to abandon her own baby?
- eastwood24, on 05/12/2009, -0/+34Well to be fair, the baby was the least favorite of her seven children.
- buddamus, on 05/12/2009, -1/+31Can we sterilize her in case she continues to breed
- mcoulter876, on 05/12/2009, -2/+25What the ***** is up with that picture?
- MatzahMan, on 05/12/2009, -1/+23I nominate this women for the Best Mom Award 2009.
- Shogi, on 05/12/2009, -0/+21I guess one of the cords failed.
- bixby1, on 05/11/2009, -3/+23This also disqualified her from Wilmar's 'Double-Wide Mother of the Year' competition.
- GraceMolloy, on 05/12/2009, -0/+20and Obama just yanked ALL of the Abstinence only funding. Normally I vote conservative (not this neo-con ***** either) but I agree with his decision. Abstinence only education does NOT work.
- Hraes, on 05/12/2009, -1/+21pretty sure the abandonment is the least ***** up aspect of this story
- inactive, on 05/11/2009, -1/+18If only it was that simple.
- Manther, on 05/12/2009, -1/+17Waiting isn't about being smart, it's about controlling your desires... something that, the world should understand by now, is very difficult to do. Birth Control is about being smart, as well as educated properly. If you don't know how much birth control could help you in your life, why would you ever choose to use it? However, if these people were educated in the fact that they can use protection and still have their sex, with much less chance of having a baby, I'd bet they ALL use it.
- Shogi, on 05/12/2009, -1/+14TUCK N' ROLL!
- skintigh, on 05/12/2009, -1/+13Agreed, marshall64. If we could only convince humans to not be human, to never err like humans, and to not have human desires, everything the conservatives tell us would work out perfectly.
- CoD4, on 05/12/2009, -1/+13What's funny about this situation people who are smart enough to realize they shouldn't have kids are usually the ones who are more responsible
- Gee1004, on 05/12/2009, -2/+13Alot of babies have been flying out of cars lately
- yocouchdigga, on 05/12/2009, -1/+12"Drunk Dad Throws a Party"
- zomgwaffles, on 05/12/2009, -0/+11the baby's feet?
- Novalight, on 05/12/2009, -0/+11Picture is awesome!
- idavidtang, on 05/12/2009, -0/+9I would assume it's simpler than taking care of a posse of water rats.
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -6/+15if only.
But the republican party would never allow for that, not because it violates personal rights, but because their membership is dwindling. They need all the trailer trash they can get. - sndream, on 05/12/2009, -0/+9Dysgenics is happening, dumb ppl will take over the world by over-breeding.
- borez, on 05/12/2009, -0/+8Seriously, what the ***** was she thinking?
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -1/+9If she was a producer of periods this wouldn't have happened.
- Fullvinyl, on 05/12/2009, -1/+9I would say not just free, but compulsory.
- donquixotex, on 05/12/2009, -0/+8I read it as "Drunk Baby flies from car, mom flees the scene"
I was like, WTF??
i am now terribly disappointed. - specialK16, on 05/12/2009, -0/+7@dontreplytome:
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*takes a breath*
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - Bloodwine, on 05/12/2009, -0/+7The funny thing is that we're encouraging these idiots to breed.
In a same world, we would just leave these people to their own devices and they would either starve or die from lack of other resources. We need to stop artificially propping up the idiot population. Let them go extinct. - borez, on 05/12/2009, -0/+6I find bungee cord has a little too much give myself and tends to result in the occasional case of whiplash i.e. not good.
FTA a roof rack and paracord do the trick nicely, it's army approved and the kids: A. Get some fresh air and B. Get to pretend dad has a convertible that could also double as a spaceship or a yacht with a few nicely placed cardboard cut-outs resembling: A. Space wings, or B. A sail. - bashnu, on 05/12/2009, -0/+6She does not qualify as a mother.
Merely a producer of . - dalittle, on 05/12/2009, -3/+9You should have to pass a test to be allowed to have children.
- mparker21311, on 05/12/2009, -1/+7The problem with people now is that we are so selfishly afraid of the state that our immediate concern isn't the condition of our children but how we can avoid getting into trouble.
- minnecrapolis, on 05/12/2009, -1/+7@Mercedes
And it's too bad it isn't in vogue anymore.
My neighbor, as an example, has 6 kids from 5 different fathers. She is a hardcore welfare case and whenever one kid is old enough to go to school (and she could then get a job) she pops out another one.
She came over asking me to buy food for their dog because she "couldn't afford it" and the dog hadn't eaten for 2 days. Now I am in the works of getting her to give me the dog.
One of her kids had the nerve to tell me and my girlfriend that his mom said we are "going to Hell" because we don't believe in God and we drink beer and never go to church. This coming from a supposed hardcore Catholic who has never been married and has a village worth of children from multiple men.
Yep. That's white trash.
I think, if people want to use the system (welfare) they should be required to go on birth control. Some people actually need help from the system and that is why I can see not requiring sterilization but birth control isn't permanent. Get off the welfare and you're free to have children. - amcnair, on 05/12/2009, -0/+5Totally incorrect. If you had a Blood Alcohol Content of even 1% you would be dead. One half of one percent (0.50%) is enough to kill many people, and is likely to render the user comatose. The legal limit for driving is eight one hundredths of one percent or 0.08%.
- tcklord, on 05/12/2009, -0/+5I stand corrected, my bad.
- yuanzhoulu, on 05/12/2009, -0/+5that's not the force of gravity.
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -1/+6They make duct tape for a reason.
- Rudegar, on 05/12/2009, -0/+5thats why the lady is a tramp!
- dhughes, on 05/12/2009, -0/+5 This reminds of the time I was stopped at a red light, the left turn lane in front of me had cars turning, just as the left lane arrow went yellow a car sped down the lane to beat the light and took the turn fast and sharp, they should have known better with their small dog in the passenger window!
As the car turned the small dog experienced the force of gravity only it was sideways and went flying out the window, did a barrel roll on the ground and took off running.
The car didn't even stop.
Now, if that had been a baby...freaky! - athinnes, on 10/01/2009, -1/+6I read that "baby flies from car drunk, mom flees scene".
Comma placement means everything. - DirtyVicar, on 05/12/2009, -1/+5There's been enough of these stories over the past 5 or 10 years that I'm seriously starting to believe in the idea of eugenics. There really should be a point in which you've proven yourself unworthy of parenting.
- asgardshill, on 05/12/2009, -2/+6Cumtrap < mother
- Fustigations, on 05/12/2009, -0/+4So how do you enforce such a thing? I think it's overwhelmingly obvious, especially in this case, that personal responsibility is not a factor *at all*. All people (I would say, in fact, most people) do not have the moral grounding to allow such a thing. Abstinence only education is retarded. "making people responsible for their actions" is an impossibility in this case because 1. you can not stake out every spot that potential parents may copulate. (not near enough man power / funds, and quartering is unconstitutional...) 2. after the progeny is produced, you can not enforce the taking care of the baby (see 1), and if you lock the parent(s) up, that pretty much undermines trying to make somebody take care of a kid there doesn't it, sparky...
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -0/+4Duct tape > bungee cords.
- inactive, on 05/12/2009, -0/+4Sorry man, but I'm a conservative, and I say spay this bitch before she has a litter.
- nyxerebos, on 05/12/2009, -0/+4And how in the world is that going to be enforced? Child services can't be everywhere, and it's not as if we can just sterilize people who are demonstrably poor candidates for parenthood.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 140 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is