What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Play the flash game. view!
DragonAgeJourneys.com - Play the free companion flash game to Dragon Age: Origins.
58 Comments
- dayoldblues, on 07/08/2009, -2/+31Or MAYBE all slime is ancient T. rex tissue...
- j3ff86, on 07/08/2009, -0/+20This slime is potent stuff. We made a toaster dance with it, then a bathtub tried to eat his friend's baby.
- walker4bc, on 07/08/2009, -1/+20If this is really just bacterial residue, all you can say is OOOPS! But seriously, how can there be debate in today's day and age about whether something is ancient dinosaur tissue or bacterial residue? I would think there would be a few differences to say the least.
- Lewie, on 07/08/2009, -0/+15You're not sleeping with it, are you?
- wannaBdug, on 07/08/2009, -0/+11Ah seeing scientist doing the happy dance is something I need to see.
- doctechnical, on 07/08/2009, -0/+9Can someone explain to me the difference between "ordinary" and "extraordinary" slime? Because I'm pretty sure in the latter case Ray is going to want a sample.
- Jektal, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8Sounds like that would hurt...
- techdever, on 07/08/2009, -2/+10Probably someone whipped his nose with the T.rex fossil
- Jektal, on 07/08/2009, -1/+9Wasn't that part of the plot of the Super Mario Bros movie?
- bluebirdgm, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8What you have there is what we refer to as a focused, non-terminal repeating phantasm, or a Class Five full roaming vapor. Real nasty one, too.
- bluebirdgm, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8Gah, not just beaten to the punch with a GB reference, but a better one, too. ::diggs::
- inactive, on 07/08/2009, -1/+7Oh no!
Nickelodeon's WMD stash has been discovered! - andrewlotta, on 07/08/2009, -1/+7What exactly does "old slime" consist of?...
- mrfuzz, on 07/08/2009, -0/+5crank up the clone - o - tron and make me one !
- PowderedToasty, on 07/08/2009, -0/+5Clone it anyway! Where the ***** are the cloned dinosaurs??? You call your selves scientists.
- 8347, on 07/08/2009, -0/+5It's a coverup! It really is T-Rex tissue. The government plans to clone the T-Rex and drop a live one on Tokyo to battle Godzilla.
- Dlipford360, on 07/08/2009, -1/+6it could be t-rex tissue...if the earth was only 6000 years old.
:P
fffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu - DarkBlueAnt, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but what they were examining doesn't sound like slime.
- immatellyouwhat, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4It's ancient T-Rex spooge.
- sdphost, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4Hold on to your butts.
- moofree, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4Next we'll find out that the Legends of the Hidden Temple face wasn't real.
- ApokalypseNow, on 07/09/2009, -0/+4Your continued use of the word "clearly" does not make it clear, nor does it refute the many converging lines of evidence and inquiry that show you're full of *****.
- BoneheadFarker, on 07/08/2009, -0/+3@exhale99
http://nelsonhaha.com/ - inactive, on 07/08/2009, -1/+4crazed is right, what are you even talking about?
- inactive, on 07/08/2009, -0/+3Why not just read the article?
"...researchers concluded that the substances were most likely remnants of biofilms, or layers of bacterial cells and the sticky molecules they secrete." - e73v3n, on 07/08/2009, -0/+3Who you gonna call ??!?!?!?
- TracerMan, on 07/08/2009, -0/+3No baby t rexes?
- Davbis93, on 07/08/2009, -2/+4"slime" hah! What is the chemical formula for "slime" ???
- inactive, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2Crap.. I read that in and in my mind I heard it in Nelson's voice.
- aristotle0dude, on 07/08/2009, -2/+4I'm astounded by your unshakeable faith in corrupt modern humans just because they have the title of "scientist".
- Mnementh2230, on 07/09/2009, -0/+2"Is that what bacteria does to corpses? How 'bout your teeth?"
Are corpses or teeth usually fossilized, fool?
No.
You're comparing apples to oranges. - Smilodon, on 07/08/2009, -1/+3Don't be ridiculous - that slime is obviously from Xenu's handkerchief.
Be afraid, be very afraid. - askantik, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2Not sure what you got buried for. I wondered what the hell "old slime" is, too. Perhaps it's some scientific term I don't know about.
- graemee, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2It came from the sewers.
- pingpants, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2Haha!
- Diggpick, on 07/08/2009, -6/+7Seriously? I'm astounded that some people believe there is even a possibility of it being T. Rex tissue. It's 70 million years old. Million.
- SkippyDoorknob, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1What about new slime?
- techmaster, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1What we first need to do is run a carbon dating test on it, then we can figure out what time the dinosaur said "I don't know"
- omae, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1Kleenex has come a long ways since they first started with their rock line
- BigLou, on 07/08/2009, -3/+4Guys, this obviously proves the Earth is 6,000 years old. Scientists are just upset that Dinosaurs were around in the 60's and now they're making excuses to not disprove their obviously moronic theory that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Duh.
- failtrain, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1Bob Geldof!
Wait a minute... - weif, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1Hence Schweitzer's comment that they had done some DNA testing on the sample... Read the article.
- KingGorilla, on 07/09/2009, -0/+1ordinary slime: Stuff on old food
Extraordinary slime: Flubber - GeorgeStone2, on 07/08/2009, -1/+2DURP.
"they decided to just change their model to fit the evidence"
What is science for $400 please, Alex. - handheldchimp, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1Pet T-Rex here I come!!
- MayorMcCheapo, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1My aunt Sadie has had slime growing on her since the 80's, but we only call her "dinosaur" as a joke.
- imikedaman, on 07/08/2009, -1/+2Are you completely unaware that we send robots to the moon to perform infinitely better data collection than a person ever could?
- Sillyputty81, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1Wasn't this the same skeleton that was peer-reviewed as having matched sequences of collagen proteins with modern-day ostriches?
http://digg.com/general_sciences/How_a_T_Rex_Femur ...
This is a must-read article with a great description of how theories are peer-reviewed and challenged. - HAL90000, on 07/08/2009, -2/+2This article is nearly a year old. I could make a pun about the article itself being ancient, but I'll let someone else have the honors.
-
Show 51 - 61 of 61 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is