Users who Dugg This
Derek Ward
2691 Followers
ghostkiller001
2025 Followers
NewsMeBack
6467 Followers
Digging slowy, medical problem
14445 Followers










rblancarteMay 10, 2011
"What’s even more troubling was the finding from our survey that indicated that a majority of parents of kids 10 and under seemed largely unconcerned by their children’s use of the site."
100% Parent failure, 0% Facebook failure
goweigusMay 10, 2011
for that majority, I'm sure a fair portion don't know computers well enough to figure out that their kid is using facebook unless the kid tells them or gets caught while actually using the website
mccscott71May 10, 2011
that was factual and abusive of the technically inept.
extra credit 2 U
charlotte_webMay 10, 2011
I have a 12 year old. Not only is she on it, but all of her friends are on it as well (practically everyone she knows). And they are all very active.
The house rule is that I have her password, so I can log in at any time (I generally don't, but just to let her know to keep everything kid-friendly). Her computer is located in the most high-trafficked area of the house, so there's nothing secretive going on. And we've had discussions about not friending strangers and the like.
I've told her when I thought there was inappropriate content on her FB page, and she's deleted it. I've asked her to remove certain friends, and she has.
Here's my opinion: properly managed, FB is a wonderful tool. The problem comes when parents aren't concerned about what their kids are doing online, and give them carte blanche to do anything and everything.
As I see it, not only am I teaching my daughter to use FB (and, by default, the internet) responsibly, but reading her updates gives me a world of insight into what's going on with her mentally and emotionally that I probably would not have seen, otherwise. I think FB is a fantastic tool for parents.
Personally, I'd love to see FB allow pre-teens to create accounts, and give parents some additional tools to monitor/control their kid's online activity.
bobd1eMay 10, 2011
Most kids find a way around it, honestly
charlotte_webMay 10, 2011
Maybe, but that's every kid. When I was a kid, I found was around my parents' rules, too. At least by allowing her to do it and monitoring her activities, I'm able to guide her towords responsible online behavior.
UnaBomberrrMay 10, 2011
my 12 year old uses facebook but we have her password and monitor it regularly.
She also only uses the desktop in the family room and doesnt have a computer in her room
mccscott71May 10, 2011
Big shock.Luckily my kid would rather be skateboarding,fishing ,biking,playing soccer.
lordvanceMay 10, 2011
...because using an online social network that hosts thousands of local sports groups while participating in local sports yourself is impossible?
I don't use facebook for many reasons, but my choice to avoid it for anything other than work has nothing to do with my level of outdoor activities...
mccscott71May 10, 2011
My son prioritizes his time to the activities he enjoys most.When he does sit down to facebook,he usually uses the chat feature to practice talking smack to his compadres.His computer time is mainly spent trying to catch new skateboard tricks on you-tube.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
chali1690May 10, 2011
>practice talking smack...
wat
lordvanceMay 10, 2011
To be honest, now I'm just plain confused by this entire thread...
Step 1: Read article that discusses the very real issue with young children using social networking sites with little, if any, supervision.
Step 2: Make the comment "Big shock.Luckily my kid would rather be skateboarding,fishing ,biking,playing soccer." - Heavily implying that your child does not use said social networking site.
Step 3: Make the reply to another persons comment "...When he does sit down to facebook..." - Directly commenting on the fact that your own child does, in fact, use a social networking site - contradicting your the conveyed message of your original post.
Step 4: Include the phrase "...practice talking smack to his compadres..." thoroughly confusing the s**t out of the internets.
----------------------------------------
The dangers of young people using social networking sites when not 100% supervised by their parents are very real - the frequency at which your child accesses these sites is not as large of a factor as you seem to think.
Article: "Children consuming cyanide shockingly on the rise!"
Comment: "Luckily, my kid prefers coolaid"
Later Comment: "When my kid does experiment with cyanide, it's mostly for the lulz..."
>.>
<.<
/facepalm
mccscott71May 11, 2011
No children,huh?
I'm the only admin on all the computers in the house and I monitor their activities as need be.They both understand "best practices and procedures" actually means,if you're not sure ask dad,which they do.Apparently you misunderstood my post.My intention was to convey the fact that my youngest,while completely capable of accessing the internets himself,typically chooses activities outside.Now as for the comparison to the kool-aid drinking sheeple;You have absolutely no idea what,or who,you are talking about.And on an end note;If you are unaware of the intellect stretching game of talking "smack",perhaps you should develop a social-life yourself that involves humorous interaction with people in the really-real world./grabs crotch and lifts in your direction*Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
lordvanceMay 11, 2011
What happened to all your poor spaces? :(
"Apparently you misunderstood my post.My intention was to convey the fact that my youngest,while completely capable of accessing the internets himself,typically chooses activities outside"
Indeed, I did misunderstand your post - because you failed to convey your thought properly. You absolutely implied that you were luckily exempt from the worries of this article, because your son chooses to do other activities at the exclusion of social networking online. You later contradicted this statement. I pointed it out for the funneh, funneh lulz.
"Now as for the comparison to the kool-aid drinking sheeple;You have absolutely no idea what,or who,you are talking about."
Here I think you just plain missed my entire point. It had absolutely nothing to do with "kool-aid drinking sheeple." I was merely taking our discussion up until that point, and dialing it up to 11 (in this case replacing social networking with cyanide and sports with coolaid) to point out the miscommunication of your original post. You gave no context to the idea of being "lucky" - so the most logical conclusion was that "lucky" meant exempt from worry.
"And on an end note;If you are unaware of the intellect stretching game of talking "smack",perhaps you should develop a social-life yourself that involves humorous interaction with people in the really-real world."
See, now this was purely just chali1690 and myself poking fun at your verbiage. My comment (and I assume his as well) obviously had nothing to do with the connotation of your post (your son shoots the s**t with real life friends online) and everything to do with the downright humorous way you chose to express that thought ("practice talking smack to his compadres").
"/grabs crotch and lifts in your direction*"
This makes me worry for your children, am I wrong in assuming you are a professional wrestling fan? ...or that Larry the Cable Guy is your personal hero?
As for children - no, but my girlfriend and I are about to start trying for our first (no, not married - but we've been together for 9 years - it's not a commitment issue, I simply have no interest in joining an institution which disallows so many of my friends from participation simply on the basis of their choice in a life partner). I can only hope that my future child has plenty of compadres to practice the intellect-stretching game of "smack" with.
(As an aside, I thought "compadre" was the spanish equivalent of a godfather - I am unsure of it's usage here, but it strikes me as strange. Isn't the modern connotation a lifelong male-male friendship, usually with children about the same age?)
chali1690May 11, 2011
the 15 minutes you spent typing this comment you could have just saved 15% on your car insurance
taiyoryuMay 10, 2011
the fact that these children are unsupervised is the fault of the parents and not facebook. if you're a parent, it's your responsibility to keep tabs on your children, their associations, and activities whether it's online or not. as your children exhibit a proven track record of good decision making and trustworthiness, then you can allow them to become more independent. your job as a parent is not to shield your children from the world. your job is to give them the tools and knowledge to deal with it.
nightofwadeMay 10, 2011
Facebook should go back to what its intended purpose was.- college kids
nightfire08May 10, 2011
No s**t?
theprocrastinatorMay 10, 2011
that's the thing with the internet all you have to do to verify your age is click a button saying so, it's not like a club where they ask 4 an i.d
wealthmanagerMay 10, 2011
This is a bad news... Those kinds unsupervised by their parents on using this social network are at risk.
ObligedcartonMay 10, 2011
I don't understand why this is a problem?
nightfire08May 10, 2011
No s**t?
theprocrastinatorMay 10, 2011
that's the thing with the internet all you have to do to verify your age is click a button saying so, it's not like a club where they ask 4 an i.d
purpleheartcarsMay 10, 2011
this is something that we need to watch out for. Kids under the age of 12 should not be unsupervised. Kids can get in a lot of trouble on Facebook.
timedalkatMay 10, 2011
Somewhere Pedobear is laughing and rubbing his hands together.
mccscott71May 10, 2011
and my kids at home practicing the "twist" of the blade in the femoral artery.
anweshroy62May 10, 2011
But when you sign in you need to be 18+ right???
norman619May 10, 2011
Underaged for what? And why is it news that lots of kids 13 and under use it?
laurahoustonMay 10, 2011
wow, 5 million kids under the age of ten.
Facebook is like "online shopping" for pervs and criminals of all types..
nikowolfMay 10, 2011
gees here we go...
norman619May 10, 2011
You can say the same stupid thing for shopping centers and public parks.