roosterteeth.com— In an effort to capitalize on the overwhelming popularity of the DiggBar, RoosterTeeth.com introduces new feature that frames Digg links (and only Digg links) in its very own c**kBar.
Apr 17, 2009View in Crawl 4
I registered for the sake of mentioning that this proves how UTTERLY RETARDED the diggbar is, I've already implemented code in EVERY PAGE of all my websites to prevent it from showing. The c**kbar is much more reasonable, and will not be blocked for the time being. Seriously, its a c**kbar.Just to prove it, I plan to have my own version up and running by the end of this evening. Seriously.
Kinda funny, but I don't see what the big deal about the DiggBar is. You just need to choose "Always Hide" once and it's gone forever. The option isn't even hidden in settings or anything, it's right there.
now take that pic with all the site toolbars (c**kbar + diggbar + myspace bar) and add in to the screenshot a whole bunch of browser toolbars (google toolbar + yahoo toolbar + alexa toolbar + stumbleupon toolbar) mix them together and you get 80% toolbar + 20% actual site content ..now that's a keeper.
The worst part is (besides its pointlessness) that on Opera on Mac, DiggBar steals focus from the rest of the page.So if you go to an outbound link with the DiggBar on it, you can't use the arrow keys to scroll unless you click somewhere on the webpage first.
Digg knows its frame is s**t. This stuff was tried way back in 96 (or was it 99?) and it pissed off everyone, and the retarded concept died. Suddenly, like a zombie thirsty for money, framing has returned...Framing target sites is step 1, step 2 is "underline" text ads using JavaScript (you know those annoying text ads that underline text with two lines) Step 3 is framing the page with ad banners, Step 4 is closing down f**king Digg because everyone has gone away.
fhajad034Apr 17, 2009
I think the whole thing is stupid.
mightymatt54Apr 17, 2009
I registered for the sake of mentioning that this proves how UTTERLY RETARDED the diggbar is, I've already implemented code in EVERY PAGE of all my websites to prevent it from showing. The c**kbar is much more reasonable, and will not be blocked for the time being. Seriously, its a c**kbar.Just to prove it, I plan to have my own version up and running by the end of this evening. Seriously.
spookyttwsApr 18, 2009
Kinda funny, but I don't see what the big deal about the DiggBar is. You just need to choose "Always Hide" once and it's gone forever. The option isn't even hidden in settings or anything, it's right there.
thaskizzApr 18, 2009
A great idea and a great parody of the digg bar.
str3amaApr 18, 2009
now take that pic with all the site toolbars (c**kbar + diggbar + myspace bar) and add in to the screenshot a whole bunch of browser toolbars (google toolbar + yahoo toolbar + alexa toolbar + stumbleupon toolbar) mix them together and you get 80% toolbar + 20% actual site content ..now that's a keeper.
abid786Apr 18, 2009
The worst part is (besides its pointlessness) that on Opera on Mac, DiggBar steals focus from the rest of the page.So if you go to an outbound link with the DiggBar on it, you can't use the arrow keys to scroll unless you click somewhere on the webpage first.
feacesfaceApr 18, 2009
Digg knows its frame is s**t. This stuff was tried way back in 96 (or was it 99?) and it pissed off everyone, and the retarded concept died. Suddenly, like a zombie thirsty for money, framing has returned...Framing target sites is step 1, step 2 is "underline" text ads using JavaScript (you know those annoying text ads that underline text with two lines) Step 3 is framing the page with ad banners, Step 4 is closing down f**king Digg because everyone has gone away.