news.bostonherald.com— Each year its competitors add new features to their mid-range mp3 players, making already good products that much better. But then September rolls along and the iPod nano undergoes a redesign that puts it just out of reach at the top of the class. — Submitted Sep 27, 2008
It's actually another release to get the line back to what the people prefer. And hey, nicer screens aren't a bad thing.It's not like you're forced to upgrade or anything... it's just making the nano better.
@zsigI encode all my CD's in Apple Lossless, so yes I would need that much. Currently my 80GB classic has 26GB left as it is. And my library is ever expanding.
I would say you're in the minority then. Most headphones wouldn't be able to produce distinguishably different sound when comparing the lossless format to a regular MP3. Unless you spend over a $100, but then you're even further off, because you look like a dork walking around with earmuffs on.
umbolo Sep 27, 2008
You're a double agent.
mmaster23 Sep 27, 2008
You mean YP .. not yepYP-K3 ftw! (altough I only use my iPhone these days)
cthellis Sep 28, 2008
It's actually another release to get the line back to what the people prefer. And hey, nicer screens aren't a bad thing.It's not like you're forced to upgrade or anything... it's just making the nano better.
mouthymadness Sep 29, 2008
@zsigI encode all my CD's in Apple Lossless, so yes I would need that much. Currently my 80GB classic has 26GB left as it is. And my library is ever expanding.
mouthymadness Sep 29, 2008
I like my racial iPod Classic thank you.
zsig Sep 30, 2008
I would say you're in the minority then. Most headphones wouldn't be able to produce distinguishably different sound when comparing the lossless format to a regular MP3. Unless you spend over a $100, but then you're even further off, because you look like a dork walking around with earmuffs on.