Users who Dugg This
James PowerDigger Chase
10242 Followers
Art Thou Bored
2897 Followers
Tiresias II
657 Followers
Russ Smith
18395 Followers
Kip Linski
1307 Followers
Dave Spencer
120 Followers
thepowerdiggerAug 17, 2010
here's the offending pic http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim//2010/06/25/BabyBongSPL_370x278.jpg
sjl127Aug 18, 2010
assh**e police
robbh66Aug 18, 2010
This is far more the case of the mother being an absolute f**king moron than the police being assh**es.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
I love marijuana. But anyone willing to get their animals or young children stoned, are f**king stupid.
phucktardedAug 18, 2010
That baby is doing some mad rips, but it looks like he cashed the bowl, what a douche.
djbandit23Aug 18, 2010
Reward achieved. +200 internets.
black27696Aug 18, 2010
Is anyone else really f**king tired of the "you win xx internets!" meme? There are other memes that are old and tired, but still occasionally funny. This one pisses me off whenever I see it. Shut up, it's stupid.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ultimate5metalAug 18, 2010
@black: Reeeeeeeawrrrrr
syntaxgsAug 18, 2010
WHAT,,,, The dgu put in side a babye I don,t tthing it supose too do it what the bottle but I dn,t Think it Rear lee is one
iceman21Aug 18, 2010
That two year old running joke is getting old, why do people dig this guy up?
Do something new.
mysticaloneAug 18, 2010
I want to lick your ear lobes, and nibble on your neck syntaxgs
revenger543Aug 18, 2010
Sorry syntaxgs, it looks like you finally mpjued het krsah.
doublestopAug 18, 2010
Syntaxgs makes me burst out laughing every f**king time.
Never Digg him down.
poonchowAug 18, 2010
If you don't smile after reading syntaxgs comments then you are not human, you COWARDLY HUMAN POSING ALIENS!
black27696Aug 18, 2010
@iceman
Well, part of it is that people believe they're being ironic by loving someone on digg who uses horrible grammar. The thing is, he's not even consistent. It's already been shown in his old history that he originally commented in perfectly acceptable english.
joannchiladaAug 18, 2010
syntaxgs writes pretty much exactly like I do on Ambien. Are you on Ambien, syntaxgs?
powderedtoastyAug 18, 2010
I want to see Syntaxgs and Merlin in a to the death cage match.
rhumu17Aug 18, 2010
@powderedtoasty merlin has nothing on syntaxgs, syntaxgs has been making me laugh since i joined digg
sagagsAug 18, 2010
Translation: WHAT?! The drugs are inside the baby, I think you are supposed to do that with a bottle but I don't think that is really a bottle.
shodanxAug 18, 2010
you're old news syntaxgs, it's all about merlin now !!
brucealmightyAug 18, 2010
He was just showing Mom the correct way to hold it...
eikon89Aug 18, 2010
That baby got high as f**k.
revenger543Aug 18, 2010
I LOL'd at the picture.
dcjoedogv2Aug 18, 2010
Can't she demand to know who her accuser is?
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
the accuser is the state with publicly available evidence.
sprucecabooseAug 18, 2010
I am incredibly informed about marijuana. It is still grossly negligent and irresponsible as hell to have an infant around drugs or drug paraphernalia. When you are an adult, you make your own choices and live with the consequences. You do not have that luxury when you are an infant, and it is the adult's job to make sure the child is safe and taken care of.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
don't know why your being dugg down Spruce, cause your right. This isn't about legalizing or any of that s**t, this mother is clearly irresponsible and shouldn't have children to begin with.
I think your being dugg down by the "legalize it!" crowd without anyone understanding your comment is about the childs safety.
sprucecabooseAug 18, 2010
For the record, I am part of the "legalize it" crowd. Just the responsible part. Children should not be using or exposed to mind altering drugs (I know the bong was likely empty, still not smart letting a child play with a potentially resin filled bong and/or glass slide which could also be a choking risk). Their brains are not fully formed and they do not yet understand the consequences that can go with poor choices. That is why they are kids and not adults.
sealbeaterAug 18, 2010
If you are so well informed, please tell me what harm an empty "resin filled" bong presents to a child? It's obvious the kid isn't going to choke on a glass slide with his mom right there.
What I would like to see is charges brought against parents who give their kid Ritalin, but we all know state sponsored drug abuse is ok.
If the kid had had a tobacco pipe in his mouth, couldn't you make the same arguments?
elamoAug 23, 2010
@sealbeater: Agreed on the ritalin part, and yes on the tobacco part.
The problem is not necessary the illegality (though that is an issue) but more that kids should not be exposed to potentially harmful things.
PS: I know, marijuana is physically safe and has never killed anyone. However, when used irresponbily it is very likely to have a negative effect on the users life.
mastercosbyAug 18, 2010
I like how they blur out the baby's face like people are going to recognize it.
nikokunAug 18, 2010
sheesh, it's not like my parents didn't show me their bong when I was a kid. What's the problem here? Is there any evidence that she made the baby smoke pot? No? Then case closed, stop being assh**e police.
djbandit23Aug 18, 2010
I feel sorry for that diaper when he gets baby munchies.
eezyvilleAug 18, 2010
That diaper will be doing its job.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
How is babby stoned?
infinitewithinAug 18, 2010
Somebody was arrested for taking a picture. A picture. Not a crime. A picture.
greg2kAug 18, 2010
Girl got pragnent.
thegreenspanputAug 18, 2010
tax dollars well spent, bravo
mrcashycashAug 17, 2010
It's tobacco, man.
vbullingerAug 17, 2010
Yeah, cause giving cigarettes to a baby is totally cool, right?
quaxonAug 18, 2010
This is by far the coolest baby ive ever seen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mx4Nx7xKLB4
mrdowntempoAug 18, 2010
No, it's not cool, but it shouldn't be illegal either. And it certainly shouldn't be wasting the police's time.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Wow.. you clearly have absolutely NO sense of humour or your sarcasm radar needs fixing. Bloody hell.. he made a joke you f**king humourless bastard.
doublestopAug 18, 2010
"No, it's not cool, but it shouldn't be illegal either. And it certainly shouldn't be wasting the police's time."
Wait, what?
shutaroAug 17, 2010
Who's to say she posed it? You know how the kids are, these days...
vendrakeAug 18, 2010
I know. Mom's arrested, but the kid get's off with a lecture. It's no wonder kids these days have no sense of responsibility.
enderwigginAug 18, 2010
The same thing happens to disobedient kids these days as it did thousands of years ago... they get stoned.
nithin009Aug 17, 2010
New precedence, many people make fake status to look hilarious. Will police arrest all of those who put their status as drugged or drunk or raped!
aunttalithaAug 18, 2010
I guess I'd better stop joking about my uncontrollable meth habit and whoring myself for snack sized bags of Cheetos. Damn this world!
chilidogsAug 18, 2010
Because making a fake status is the same as exposing a baby to drugs?
genmaAug 18, 2010
what part of that photo proves the baby was ever near any drugs?
pmkenny1234Aug 18, 2010
@chillidogs - If you read the article, you would see the baby came back negative from the drug tests. All my friends agree that my infant son looks hilarious holding onto a beer bottle, but it goes without saying that I don't give him any beer. How is this any different?
skyebekaAug 18, 2010
Cops don't know "you" personally so it does not go without saying that you don't give your child a beer to drink or a bong to puff. If someone posts a photo of what could be conceivably construed as an illegal act, they will be arrested if the police get wind of it. Then they will investigate to determine if the photo is legitimate or not. It takes a real dumb ass to post a photo like that in a public forum.
doublestopAug 18, 2010
How did you get dugg up at all? Posting a picture of yourself being a negligent and abusive parent is different from saying that you're drunk, drugged, or raped, all of which are legal.
(I'm sure someone is going to say rape is illegal, he said being raped, not raping)Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
xander99Aug 18, 2010
rape music should be illegal.
b3owulfAug 18, 2010
No, but obviously you should be arrested if you post a picture of your baby being raped.... even if its fake
poonchowAug 18, 2010
Maybe I should stop announcing to all my Facebook friends that I'm going a' rapin' tonight.
Out for a rape on the town?
Down for a good raping? hell yeah, see you at Rachel's house.
veriixAug 18, 2010
I remeber the first time I got arrested after being raped.
Closed AccountAug 17, 2010
Parenting class: rule 25:
Keep your infant away from your illegal drugs.
legalskepticAug 17, 2010
FTA: "the baby had no injuries and drug tests came back negative."
Baby was in no danger. No lighter, no weed, under supervision.
Not going to disagree with the idiot part, but in her defense, I did a lot of stupid s**t when I was 19, and if I had a baby then it probably would have been in much worse danger than that baby for the sake of lulz. This really just shows that 19-year-olds shouldn't have children.
Closed AccountAug 17, 2010
Here's the problem, it looks like (because she was stupid enough to take a picture)...she might be stupid enough to use in the vicinity of her kid.
I understand everyone wants to be understanding.....butComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
@quirkopatra
If she smoked pot in close proximity with her baby, nothing would happen except some good old fashioned play time. If it's not harmful to babies in the womb, I'm pretty confident that a little marijuana smoke is leaps and bounds safer than parents who often smoke cigarettes while HOLDING their kids.
spectecjrAug 18, 2010
What's worse... she might be willing to join a group like DiggPatriots in front of her kid. I can't imagine the kind of damage she might do if she were stupid enough to be a member of a group like that. The kind of long-term mental scarring. The kind of groupthink attempt to control the 1st amendment rights of others, while out of the other side of her mouth, claiming to be a good conservative patriot.
That kind of person might need a good spanking, at the very least.
ngmcs8203Aug 18, 2010
@spectecjr - LOL I can't believe quirkopatra is still around after being exposed in that investigation.
kotiyaAug 18, 2010
Dugg because kids shouldn't have babies.
xkorbinAug 18, 2010
What a sad woman.
smotpokerAug 18, 2010
http://digg.com/health/Cannabis_use_good_for_pregnancy_2
smotpokerAug 18, 2010
Also: http://www.mothering.com/pregnancy-birth/use-of-marijuana-during-pregnancy
tiakAug 18, 2010
rule 28:
Keep your child away from all harmless plastic tubes.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
"Keep your infant away from those substances which could harm him/her."
switch the word "could" with "will" and i will agree with you...
tap water COULD harm your infant... should you refrain from its use simply because something bad COULD happen? nope
was this baby in any danger? not at all... was this bad parenting? not in the least... the parents who give their kids sips of alcohol are worse than this...
just because something is illegal doesnt automatically make you a bad parent if you partake...
many parents speed with their kids in the car and speeding is illegal! lets arrest all the speeders with kids in their cars! <<< this would make a lot more sense than what really happened since someone speeding put more lives at risk than someone who has a bong at home and smokes a dried flower thats never killed anyone in the history of humans
haberman13Aug 18, 2010
The human race is screwed, you are being dugg down for suggesting that babies and drugs should be separated.
Wow.
What is up diggers? Are you really that self involved that you don't see anything wrong with this?
Legalize weed, but come on, be responsible; this is foolish behavior. Durrrrr ... look at the baby with the bong, hehe, durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Your bus is leaving.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
smotpokerAug 18, 2010
A bong is not a drug. The type of drug bongs are used for is relatively benign. Being in the mere vicinity of a plastic bong is not harmful and not just cause for arrest - especially when the kid isn't even old enough to remember the incident.
If this image were used for an anti-drug ad, nobody would give a s**t. It is only being prosecuted because they are unjustly biased against people who toke and don't like the message they think the image represents.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
I didn't see any drugs in that photo.
net403Aug 17, 2010
granted, that is pretty funny... so she was right there lol
flip2tripAug 17, 2010
Now, are we going to arrest parents for posting their babies holding (and evidently drinking) a beer?
http://www.suburbandaddy.com/2008/01/15/7-month-old-drinks-beer/
kooftAug 17, 2010
I think the difference is that, though you shouldn't encourage your child to engage in an adult behavior, alcohol is a drug found in various childhood medicines (regulated) while marijuana is not.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
flip2tripAug 17, 2010
So are you saying it would have been better if the baby was holding a bottle of cough syrup?
marytormeyAug 18, 2010
Well, not anymore it used to be used in cough syrup and it is actually safer then alcohol.
It seems like a freedom of speech issue to me, the child was not in any danger.
gzalziAug 18, 2010
Cough syrup feels good man.
galvoAug 18, 2010
Haha damn kooft, you're a moron.
hero0ftimeAug 18, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oRSjUtyx1o#GU5U2spHI_4
The "f**k it" shrug is the best part
exploit67Aug 18, 2010
Nah, beers legal!!
/s
georgefordAug 18, 2010
This account has been closed by the user
booyahbitchAug 18, 2010
No, but that sure as hell don't keep them from trying...
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
we legislate religious morals though... which is stupid
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Blurring the baby's face? Babies look like babies.
pepitoneAug 18, 2010
They don't want his friends judging him.
akairennAug 18, 2010
The face had to be blurred to protect the privacy of Winston Churchill.
ruddy4Aug 18, 2010
Probably a high net-worth individual, like the E-trade baby.
chrismwoodAug 18, 2010
I'm picturing a police lineup of babies. I can't even tell gender half the time.
oxdeltaxoAug 18, 2010
My mom dressed me in pink when I was a baby to mess with them.
badgerbusAug 18, 2010
Oddly enough, I've heard from several people that they don't want any pictures of their babies on the internet, because 'you never know what can happen'.
enderwigginAug 18, 2010
It's true -- I always try to seek out and rape any babies I see on the internet.
creationismlolAug 18, 2010
mom?
sulakattackAug 18, 2010
damn, her baby was just bound to do drugs with a face that pixelated
mysticaloneAug 18, 2010
it's like that upside down face kid.
rpatrick819Aug 18, 2010
No, it's blurry BECAUSE of the drugs.
edwarddouglasAug 18, 2010
How can you be arrested for a photo of illegal drug use? To my knowledge, photos of drug use are inadmissible in court because there is no way to prove that illegal drugs are in the photo. It could be anything no matter what it looks like it may be.
1fastdakAug 18, 2010
She is not being charged with drug use. Just drug paraphernalia, not a very big deal.
edwarddouglasAug 18, 2010
A bong with no marijuana residue is not drug paraphernalia. It is sold in stores all over the US for tobacco use. It is not illegal to have or photograph.
1fastdakAug 18, 2010
True. I just made a comment below to that effect. Sadly though its probably going to cost her more to get the charges dropped than the fine would be. Although in Florida they can take your drivers license away for up to a year I think.
mweatherAug 18, 2010
"A bong with no marijuana residue is not drug paraphernalia."
In a lot of places, it is. Did you think Tommy Chong went to jail for selling used bongs?
zombiesocietyAug 18, 2010
I think you guys are overthinking it. This is less about paraphernalia and more about being a s**t mother. All they could do was charge her with paraphernalia but I'd bet any amount of money that nobody called the cops because she had a bong, they called the cops because she gave it to her baby. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
thehead1138Aug 18, 2010
I'm sorry... but you suck almost as much as that blow hard, bible thumping, Texan who turned her in! Both of you need to get laid, smoke a joint, and mind you're own f**kin business!
Had to be said. Go ahead and digg me down.
rikfAug 18, 2010
Or she had one and, at a point when it hadn't been used (no drugs in the baby's system), the baby played with it and she thought it was funny and took a pic. No evidence has been presented, or reported at least, that there were any drugs in the house, or that the bong had been used.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
My parents, who weren't s**tty by any means, have photos of me holding empty and unopened beer bottles, as well as pretending to drink from them. And guess what, I didn't wind up being a drunk or alcoholic.
Is that any different than this photo?
boredofapathyAug 18, 2010
"People Who Dugg This Also Dugg: Octo-mom..."
Odd coincidence.
kostritzer1984Aug 18, 2010
These are the worst comments ever.
mrdowntempoAug 18, 2010
No, this is the worst comment evar. <-- see I made it worse.
deadskinmaskAug 18, 2010
Was the baby smoking from it?
Who f**king cares.
People go for the open liquor w/baby shot all the time and act like its the funniest thing ever, but put some plastic in the kids hand and they send you to jail?
This does not strike me as a big deal.
xkorbinAug 18, 2010
plastic? :O?
deadskinmaskAug 18, 2010
At first glance the bong in question looked like one of those cheap coloured plastic ones.
Upon further inspection, it may be glass or pyrex.
I'm going with inconclusive.
stickyheadAug 18, 2010
What the f**k is wrong with Florida? Seriously, Floridian parents suck.
nretampAug 18, 2010
Are you kidding? They did drug tests on the kid? People pose pictures with beer bottles all the time, and there's no need to put parents in jail and babies in rehab. Stop wasting time and money on this crap.
fungowskiAug 18, 2010
The drug test was probably the most harmful part of the his whole thing.
lunchbox37Aug 18, 2010
My niece likes to grab every beer bottle she can. She comes like ninja and steals them away when we're not looking. She's 2 and been doing it for many months. It's hilarious.
peestandingupAug 18, 2010
God damn sensational media.
First of all, I dont see a kid "smoking" anything. He's clearly just holding it & biting the top of it, like you know, cause he's a baby & they bite things.
mercuryblade18Aug 18, 2010
I thought the photo was funny.
talahramaAug 18, 2010
Actually, the statistic that pot has killed zero people is false. The number is in either the single digits or low double digits from the substance itself - negligible compared to tobacco and alcohol, but not zero. I believe they're from something like an allergic reaction.
The more you know!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
zombiesocietyAug 18, 2010
No, it's definitely zero.
lukas1051Aug 18, 2010
Even if that's true, it's negligible, not even worth mentioning.
poonchowAug 18, 2010
Some people have deadly food allergies, like peanuts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut_allergy
Basically why they aren't on planes anymore. It could be different with plants, though, since peanuts and such are food and marijuana is just something you smoke.
retraceclaireAug 18, 2010
Source?
talahramaAug 18, 2010
Claire: I actually posted the source in a comment a long time ago. I'll try to dig it up for you.
Lukas: I'm not saying it should be banned. I'm all for legalization. I'm just pointing out that it's false to say that it's killed zero people. I didn't mean to give the wrong idea concerning my viewpoints.
Poon: It's particulate in the air that can trigger the allergies (peanuts specifically), which is why you can't just tell a person not to consume their allergen. That it's smoked just means that it's even more readily respired.
goweigusAug 18, 2010
studies on Jamaicans have shown that marijuana use does not have any negative effects on children even while they were in the womb
so I'd imagine that even if the baby managed to get any in its system because of its parents, it would be fine
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Studies on Jamaican potheads, by Jamaican potheads.
ruddy4Aug 18, 2010
People didn't arrest her, police did.
cornonmacabreAug 18, 2010
give the baby a gun too and take a pic. nothing wrong with that cuz he's not shooting anybody right?
please do not ever have kids.... (sad truth is you probably already have many)
I support the legalization of marijuana and have no problem with people smoking weed responsibly. but if you think it's funny and a good parenting move to hand your baby a bong for a photo shoot then chances are pretty good you suck at being a mom and should be locked away from the child.
dizanbotAug 18, 2010
or even better if your a s**tty enough parent to do the photo shoot have the sensibility not to post it on facebook of all places...
paraswarmAug 18, 2010
I daresay holding a gun is much more dangerous than teething a bong.
Is it good parenting? No. Does it warrant police intervention and drug testing a baby? Probably not.
harrisbradleyAug 18, 2010
What's worse than the media here is the law.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Bong to baby bad to justified arrest lead stupidity into lady.
kennykljAug 18, 2010
This account has been closed by the user
beerhoundAug 18, 2010
Just click the bury button once, then under the user name, click "block user". Viola, you never have to see his comments again. {;-)
keithlolbermannAug 18, 2010
Probably just trying to get the little tyke to go down for a nap.
mmb26Aug 18, 2010
Kinda messed up that she got arrested, but I really have no sympathy for someone that dumb.
hopzAug 18, 2010
This account has been closed by the user
mrdowntempoAug 18, 2010
Yay for my tax dollars at work.
atroaciousAug 18, 2010
Hey they could be used for something more useless, like locking people up for smoking marijuana
remf3Aug 18, 2010
I'm assuming you mean that you're supporting a 19 year old mother who obviously smokes pot...
I know I'll get dugg down, but we're supporting (financially) her as much as we're supporting the police for arresting her. I doubt she has the best job in the world at 19 and with at least one kid we know of.
Of course, the police response was due to someone calling an abuse hotline. They can't very well say "That ain't a big deal." Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
1fastdakAug 18, 2010
So how are they proving it was drug paraphernalia. It is not illegal to sell or own pipes. If she wants out of the charges she can get out of them its just gonna cost her more.
chilidogsAug 18, 2010
It depends on where you are, who you sell the pipes to and how you market them. In some places drug paraphernalia is absolutely illegal.
gerogeroheyAug 18, 2010
ironically motherf**king police state literally. lol
Which goes to show the proportion of stupid arrests will rise exponentially as camera sales go up. People are stupid, but cameras catch it more often. Leave people f**king alone. Because if a baby started smoking pot at 3 it would probably be on the hard stuff by 4Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
sprucecabooseAug 18, 2010
Have we really not moved past the gateway drug BS?
jamaphAug 18, 2010
C'mon Florida mom!
Way to represent our state.
Thanks.
jamaphAug 18, 2010
I don't care if the bong was real or not. Who put's bongs to the face of a baby?
What is she like 17 years old and trying to impress her wanna-gangster boyfriend?
Wise up people.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
1fastdakAug 18, 2010
Wise up? yes it should not have been done but there are literally thousands of pictures of kids with cigarettes and beer all over the internet. Being that weed is on the same danger level as caffeine this arrest is a joke. Even little kids in Mexico drink coffee. LOL
robbh66Aug 18, 2010
I love people who lump weed with caffeine and coffee. Get a clue.
tiakAug 18, 2010
@robbh86
Exactly man, two of my friends died overdosing on marijuana!
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Why, what might the bong do? Eat the baby?
1fastdakAug 18, 2010
@robbh77
I love people who lump weed with crack and heroin. Get a clue.
jamaphAug 18, 2010
It's just bad taste, and trashy.
dizanbotAug 18, 2010
@1fastdak
''@robbh77
I love people who lump weed with crack and heroin. Get a clue.''
funny thing is these people are called the police and social services so you should probably just show the "high-Larious" photo to people you trust over at your apartment and not on facebook
paraswarmAug 18, 2010
It's true. I think some diggers here are confusing ideas in their heads.
Does it warrant police intervention and drug testing a baby? No.
Is it a trashy picture and a trashy idea to put it on Facebook? Yes.
It's okay to see two sides of the same coin guys. You can stop burying the above person just because you don't agree with the police (even though the above person hasn't even mentioned the police.)
By burying him you're basically saying you find this picture to be classy and elegant, and you'd probably approve of having a similar picture of your own baby.
quaxonAug 18, 2010
leave it to some texas moralfag to always ruin everything.
dcjoedogv2Aug 18, 2010
she should demand to know her accuser. Isn't this allowed in the United States?
b3owulfAug 18, 2010
Tipping police and accusing are different things.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
moralfag?
You sound like a texas redneck to me.
Is a moralfag the opposite of a redneck?
bigshark101Aug 18, 2010
The only way this story could get any dumber would be if the police arrested the baby for intent to distribute.
protodonAug 18, 2010
so wait, we're not to let out infants do that? brb
tortillachipAug 18, 2010
Picture of mom....gross!
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_GGAmzDRA_BY/TGT7iT2qq8I/AAAAAAAAKHs/7--0XsJk-Tk/s400/babybong.jpg
b3owulfAug 18, 2010
Did you really expect anything better?
mrzaikoAug 18, 2010
Was she on total recall?
gerrykAug 18, 2010
Kuato Lives!
aubieguy333Aug 18, 2010
Not trying to argue that she's attractive, but I'm guessing when she isn't getting a mug shot for a ridiculous charge she probably looks a bit better.
purkelAug 18, 2010
i'd hit it.
zbeastAug 18, 2010
http://www.fugly.com/pictures/11089/Baby_Beer_Bottle.html
http://mitchieville.com/category/great-parenting/
call the cops
bigdoglj52Aug 18, 2010
I dunno man, that one with the gun is kinda scary.
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
I doubt she would have been arrested had it been beer.
mjparker75Aug 18, 2010
did you read the story? She wasn't arrested for doing that to the baby, she was charged with paraphernalia? So, no, she wouldn't have been arrested if it had been beer.
zombiesocietyAug 18, 2010
I think giving a baby alcohol is probably worse than giving them an empty piece of plastic.
rikfAug 18, 2010
She was arrested because of fear of child endangerment. She was charged with all they could muster as the child tested negative for drugs.
dizanbotAug 18, 2010
the beer argument doesn't make sense the reason it was flagged is because it gave them suspicion that the baby was in a dangerous environment because it is illegal as stupid as its illegality is that is why
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Giving a minor alcohol is illegal.
dizanbotAug 19, 2010
really? did not know that...and considering it was a bong and not weed the beer bottle would have been the equivalent. although the mother was also underage so you may have a point a beer bottle would have been just as bad...
ndoone170Aug 18, 2010
Wow! Unstable!
w1cked1Aug 18, 2010
Another good reason to have a facebook account... f**k her she's an idiot.
sngx1275Aug 18, 2010
Isn't this story a few months old?
cockyjeremyAug 18, 2010
It was just a joke, who cares. Like it said, the drug tests on the baby came back negative. Drop it and move on.
atroaciousAug 18, 2010
I agree, but what kind of a trashy mom would do have her baby posing with a bong?
tirauAug 18, 2010
It should not be an arrestable offense, so who cares?
navicertsAug 18, 2010
This account has been closed by the user
xander99Aug 18, 2010
I still can't believe they actually tortured that baby with blood tests to check for the highly unlikely possibility that he might've actually smoked from that bong.
zomgondoAug 18, 2010
Uh, it's pretty easy to get a urine sample from a baby :)
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Execute the entire family.
/s
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
Sounds like another taxpayer paid employee with too much power. Humor in the new Amerika will not be tolerated.
remf3Aug 18, 2010
Or another tax payer supported mother starting her child down the same path she is on. He may not know what's going on now, but those little boogers pay attention to *everything*.
Drop the f-bomb once and all of a sudden they're saying "Grandma that's f**ked up."
I swear it was my wife...
powderedtoastyAug 18, 2010
What makes you think she's supported by tax payers? I smoke weed damn near every day and I'd bet I pay more taxes then you do.
nikokunAug 18, 2010
What's the problem here exactly? People take silly pictures of their kids with beer and related stuff all the time, not bad if they're not actually drinking it.
My parents showed me their bong when I was a kid, I just thought it was neat they could make smoke rings with it, but there was nothing wrong with that.
I see no problem here unless the baby was smoking... >_>Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
damianiwinsAug 18, 2010
That baby is a straight out baller.
damianiwinsAug 18, 2010
Proof that police make things worse not better.
sprucecabooseAug 18, 2010
*sometimes
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
$502 bond.
I would think this would be a simple ticket.
aubieguy333Aug 18, 2010
My brother got arrested for having half a gram of pot. $2000 bail.
area206Aug 18, 2010
Well that has to be one of the stupider things that someone decided to post on facebook.
aubieguy333Aug 18, 2010
How many people proudly announce on the internet that they pirate movies, games, and music? While I'm a big supporter of the f**k THE RIAA movement, I would even argue that piracy causes more harm than taking a picture of your baby with a bong.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
area206Aug 19, 2010
How does that relate? I get the sense that you missed my point. Doing something illegal, and then posting on facebook is stupid. If you do that, even if its something harmless, and then you get caught then it's your own damn fault. Wanna smoke pot? fine. Wanna pretend your baby smokes pot? Who cares. At least have the good sense, though, not to advertise it to the world. That is the real problem here is just plain stupidity, not bongs and babies.
As far as pirating goes, I agree that is more harmful to society then a baby holding an empty bong. So is pretty much anything. So is littering. I just don't see how that connects with my point.
aubieguy333Aug 19, 2010
I guess I was trying to say that I think it's strange that people can brag all over the internet how they break the law when it comes to downloading, but put a staged picture of a baby with a bong on facebook and you get arrested. That doesn't mean I think it was a good idea for her to put said picture on a social network site that connects the picture to her real word information; that was obviously very dumb. I guess I'm not articulating my point very well.
czarcasmAug 18, 2010
Damn baby needs to grow the f**k up.
jake1337Aug 18, 2010
Get a job!
thesorrow87Aug 18, 2010
Another reason why nothing good comes from Texas (person who called).
mjparker75Aug 18, 2010
It's at the very least a reason to investigate the woman... right? She has her baby posed in a manner to suggest he or she's taking a bong hit. Her BABY...! Now, you can't tell from the picture whether or not drugs are being used, but once the cops check it out (and get real, they had to check it out), it'd be pretty easy to tell that the pipe has or hasn't been used for in the past. And if it's a crime to have the paraphernalia... why shouldn't she be charged for it?
It's amazing to me how many people are defending this woman. Pot?!? In a negative light?!? That won't help our agenda :) I'm pretty sure it should and will eventually be legalized, but don't defend her. She shouldn't be the pro-pot poster child.
numbskiAug 18, 2010
If I might steer this discussion in a serious direction, I make my own alcohol. Completely legal. It has crossed my mind that 21 years is waaaaay too long for a kid to learn properly about the stuff. I managed to stay away until after I was 21, but most kids don't. I'm thinking a small glass of wine with dinner should be normal, and learning what happens if you drink too much should happen at home, not with a bunch of kids at some party.
The law isn't on my side in that regard. :\
dizanbotAug 18, 2010
move to a new state, perfectly legal to give your children alcohol in you own home
http://www.chooseresponsibility.org/myths_realities/
powderedtoastyAug 18, 2010
I'm not baby expert, but I'm smart enough to know a baby that small couldn't even take a bong hit.
zomgondoAug 18, 2010
There are plenty of photos from my childhood where I'm holding a beer... I guess I must've had s**tty parents.
manwithanameAug 18, 2010
YOU DUN GOOFED
YOUR PHOTO HAS BEEN BACKTRACED AND REPORTED TO CYBER POLICE AND STATE POLICE
CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME
urmyhartbstoprAug 18, 2010
Ok... yeah it's pretty stupid. But it could be for s**t and giggles. It's not like she endangering her baby. It's just a pose.
If I pose in a picture during Halloween with a bloody knife and what seem to be a dead hooker body in the picture am I going to get arrested too?
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
andyb747Aug 18, 2010
What if your uncle decided to "pose" you next to his dick... you know... for "s**ts and giggles"
Would that be cool too?
Closed AccountAug 18, 2010
it'd actually be funny.
k1n6Aug 18, 2010
We need a law against drugs to prevent this kind of thing, then we need to create a registry and put people like this on a no-fly list.
paraswarmAug 18, 2010
10 people thought you were being serious after not finding a sarcasm closing tag.
k1n6Aug 18, 2010
If you are correct, then I am much more disturbed than when I thought they just didn't like my taste in humor.
Sometimes i didn't think you needed a /s tag.
neotechniAug 18, 2010
I'm anti-drug as the next sane person, but come on. It's not like the baby was playing with a loaded gun.
numbskiAug 18, 2010
You uh - contradicted yourself there. :P
j/k
paraswarmAug 18, 2010
If you're anti-weed then you should educate yourself on it.
Anyway, I agree.
neotechniAug 18, 2010
"If you're anti-marijuana then you should educate yourself on it."
I have, hence why I'm against it. If you're not against it, maybe YOU should educate yourself about it and stop assuming everyone who disagrees with you simply doesn't know anything about it.
paraswarmAug 18, 2010
Haha. I know far more about it than you ever will. Please give me 3 good reasons why you're against it, that I may debunk all of them.
Also, I should have known better than to partially agree with you, as well as digg you, and assume you were somewhat intelligent and open-minded. Digg changed to bury.
neotechniAug 19, 2010
I find it retarded/hypocritical that because I disagree with your claims, you think it's impossible for me to be intelligent or open minded. One topic doesnt tell you that.
I'm against it cause of the behavior I've observed personally in multiple users, and the costs I and my Mom have incurred due to them. You CANT debunk that.
Stop pretending its harmless, it's far from it.
paraswarmAug 20, 2010
Ah okay, so you're against it because you and mommy had to pay for some idiotic friends of yours. Sorry to hear you surround yourself with stupid.
For us responsible adults, weed is fine. It is harmless if you aren't a moron. If you because mentally dependent on it, that's your own fault... but that means they would have become mentally dependent on alcohol anyway. So don't blame an entire plant because of your stupid little "experience".