Users who Dugg This
Myles Braithwaite
16 Followers
Leo Laporte
57662 Followers
aprigliano
22 Followers
Branden McWha
26 Followers
Paul Maior
105 Followers
Stephen Heron
45 Followers
Tobias Bischoff
8 Followers











ruretardedSep 7, 2010
still very impressive
falserSep 7, 2010
I just farted.
hipmanSep 8, 2010
Thanks for sharing?.
AWildSnorlaxSep 8, 2010
[Kevin]: Level 1 Human Muppet <Digg.com Admin> - The Internet
1 player total
[Corporation] whispers: we need more traffic, want over 9000 money?
[Kevin] whispers: interesting... tell me more.
[Corporation] whispers: just join our guild and you will become wealthy beyond your wildest dreams
Kevin has been kicked out of the guild by Common Sense.
Kevin has joined the guild.
[Guild][Corporation]: everyone welcome our newest addition, he will be bending his web site over for us as long as we pay him generously
[Guild][Break.com]: welcome aboard
[Guild][Wired.com]: hello mate!
[Guild][GenericSpamDomain.com]: greetings...
[DiggUser] whispers: wtf???????
Kevin is ignoring you.
[DiggUser] whispers: omg....
Kevin is ignoring you.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
laptopsandpartSep 7, 2010
it is market, guy. nothing else, you know how it is
ghostalkerSep 7, 2010
The same reason Digg hasn't gone back to the old version yet...
Nobody knows.
greenmountainSep 8, 2010
According to Atomised, they can't. 100% rewrite, and the folks who created V3 are gone.
http://atomized.org/2010/08/they-can’t-go-back/
The front page tells a harsh story. 15 stories, 60-120 diggs, average of 15-20 comments.
Valleywag, a gossip, so take it with some salt... in
"How To Make a Killing While Your Startup Burns"
lays it out, from the split with Adelson, to the new CEO, revealing Rose has diversified with his cash.
Rose is now "Chief Architect", as Valleywag says, "whatever that is".
So given people are gone, inevitably the digg we knew had to disappear.
It is sad, becasue it was not necessary. The easiest site to manage, because the feedback is always rtight there. Right there. All they had to do was ask, start discussions, what would folks like, what don't you like, etc. What if we try this? etc.
There would have been tremendous participation and feedback, it would have strongly reinforced to the users it is focused on you, your site.
Instead, it is skin and bones, Digg without diggers, because the people feel played, sold out.
If V4 was not created out of desperation, it certainly looks like they will be desperate soon, given the front page numbers.
Them peoples be gone, baby, gone.
tripmoon2Sep 8, 2010
I would digg you, but v4 won't let me.
r00fusSep 8, 2010
You assume the "users" are the customers... it's always been the advertising interests; now it's just removed the veil (poorly).
c_calienteSep 8, 2010
Cause they buried their f**king heads in the sand
ICanHazRedditSep 7, 2010
Buried and reported as Leo Laporte spam.
hipmanSep 8, 2010
You buried it??.
packetpaulSep 7, 2010
I call shenanigans on Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs clearly said the iPod Touch was the number one gaming platform outselling Nintendo and Sony combined. The impression left to the audience was there were more iOS devices in existence then Nintendo/Sony handheld devices. The article clearly makes a point this is simply not true.
macparrotSep 8, 2010
Well it WAS more than a little disingenuous, but there was no way he could have been talking about anything other than quarter to quarter sales. Especially since both the DS and the PSP have been on the market far longer than any Apple iOS device. Regardless, it still is an impressive sales number that they are outselling both major hand-held dedicated game consoles.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
hipmanSep 8, 2010
Well yes, macparrot, Apple does have alot of brand power.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
The iPod Touch is representative of the iOS platform in this instance. Misleading, perhaps, but still the fact is that iOS is the most popular portable gaming platform right now, and sales of iOS products are well above the combined sales of the DS line and the PSP line. Sorry that you don't like that, but developers like it, and consumers apparently like it too.
unrelated to your post: I don't understand how people can say Apple products suck, when they routinely are the most popular products in their category. Even in computers, Apple computers are far more popular than windows machines, the only thing that sells windows machines is the lower price. Other than cost, there's no reason to buy anything other than a mac, now that they natively run windows in a dual boot and can use any windows software that way. People keep buying these products, but if they're as s**tty as so many mac-haters claim, then why do they keep buying them? Every other product on earth doesn't sell if it sucks (see the Ford Pinto, Dell Jukebox, joojoo Tablet, etc.) so obviously consumers aren't just mindless sheep. They go for what they feel is the best product.
hackiewackieSep 7, 2010
Leo Laporte.. who doesn't know how Digg works (not even 700 stories dugg since he joined in) and thinks the community doesn't deserve what they want.. goes on FP. My condolences to the better people.
cawpinSep 8, 2010
Please shut the f**k up. He's using the site as it supposed to be used. If you don't like it, f**kING LEAVE.
da_nSep 9, 2010
My 2 cents hackiewackie, but why not look at reddit.com? Sounds like it would be better for you as it is more like Digg v3. Personally I am excited for Digg's future and think than v4 is a very interesting and bold step forward. They have moved to a new more scalable platform, they are working on stabilising it, and once they have they can add both required missing features as well as new ones which the old architecture wouldn't allow because it could no longer scale. Eventually, v4 will be a much superior experience to v3, like everything it just needs time.
I'll agree it was not a perfect launch, there are less features than v3, and this will always serve to frustrate some power type users, however they have promised these are either going to be added in or will an equivalent functionality (even if this is just algorithmic).
To be honest, all the complaints annoy me more than any lack of features. If the only thing you bring to the table is a big shouty voice with a pitchfork, it is better for you and your sanity if you just move on and find an alternative news site.
/2 cents
torisutanSep 9, 2010
You know, HackieWackie, I've been here since Digg started (I watched Kevin on Screensavers and was a fan), and even though I ditched my old account, I've only ever dugg maybe 300-400 stories. Not all of us think that a story deserves to be dugg if it meets the bare minimum requirements to be interesting to us. I actually want to DIG my story before I Digg it. Get it? This story isn't being dug because even though I find it interesting, I don't find it so awesomely amazing that everyone else should know about it too.
So maybe Leo is just not a power user addicted to the digging process like you are, but whatever the reason for it you should still be civil. This isn't 4chan, we all deserve respect but we all need to show respect as well.
ihateclownsSep 8, 2010
Steve Jobs is insane. I don't mean that in an anti-Apple way, I just think the dude's nuts.
jayhawk88Sep 8, 2010
Because he can. Seriously, if Jobs got up on a stage and told his audience that the sky was really yellow, and it's only through the wonder of Apple's new product iEye that people can learn that truth, a significant portion of the Apple fanbase would willing submit to major elective surgery to have their eyes replaced by digitally enhanced ones, and immediately jump online to espouse the wonder of seeing with iEye, despite the fact that it can't see the color red and only grants 20/20 vision in major cities.
What does he care if he gets called out on ridiculous sales claims? No one cares at this point. All 90% of us remember is "Wow the iPod has sold 8 kajillion units, I better check one out!"
enantiodromiaSep 8, 2010
that's sort of funny, considering the marketing copy for the Droid went something like "with a larger than life display, your human eye will barely comprehend the beauty of Android, which turns your mobile phone into a piston-powered internet multimedia pad beyond anything humans have ever seen."
srsly, look it up.
deslockSep 8, 2010
@enantiodromia
It's called humor. Most of their ads were making a joke that "droids" go beyond what humans can handle.
It's a joke dude.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
And their product still sucked balls. Seriously, I had a droid for about a week and had to return the damn thing because Android OS sucks THAT MUCH. I got an iPhone 4 and I've been happy since.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
Bro, if they made an implantable Apple product, as long as I could listen to music and/or watch porn with it without anyone knowing, I would sell my kidney and half my liver to get that.
seculrprogrsiveSep 8, 2010
Because he's a professional s**tbag?
enantiodromiaSep 8, 2010
who cares? anyone?
iamzedSep 8, 2010
I actually couldn't get enough of Leo. Till the TWiT where he said he loved digg 4. Then I started to ask myself, how f**king out of it can you be to like a totally commercialized site over user input? Is circle jerking his ideal for of the web?
Once suspension of disbelief is broken, he begins to sound like an asshat without a clue.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
So... you don't follow anyone?
Cuz I follow people... and I see maybe, MAYBE, five or six stories from major content publishers a day... the rest are all from sites I've either never heard of or only visit once in a blue moon. Call me crazy, but ever since I started reporting/hiding stories with topics I don't give a s**t about, I haven't seen any similar ones pop up. Sounds like user input to me, but hey, maybe it's corporate media sites just trying to trick me.
gilbesSep 8, 2010
Apple doesn't f**king release sales figures, and morons buy their stock. No wonder the economy has gone to hell.
pjhorrexSep 8, 2010
Of course they release sales figures, they're a publicly traded company. For instance, here's fiscal 2010 Q3 http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/20results.html.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
^Ooooo you just got TOLD, gilbes!
I bought a ton of Apple stock prior to the release of the iPod and made about $50,000 in the first year.
Granted, I also bought Google stock the first day it went for sale, and I bought about 150 shares at $20 a share, and now I own a nice house with a view, so maybe I'm just a moron who buys stock in s**tty companies.
/s
zunipusSep 11, 2010
"No wonder the economy has gone to hell."
And yet, what one company has thrived during the ongoing Bush Depression, rising to the position of the #1 tech company in the world while the Windows box sector is in decline? Morons /don't/ buy their stock. Silly little trolls...
pppmktSep 8, 2010
Communication in support of the multi-universe theory, doncha'see?
☼
robotpixelSep 8, 2010
I hate steve jobs, but like my iPhone alot. Contradiction much?
vanzant38Sep 8, 2010
Jobs also stretched the truth on the new iPod Touch's screen.
He didn't need to because the Touch has no real competition.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
Stretched the truth how? I mean, have you even bothered to look at one of the Retina Displays in person? I have, and unless I get REALLY close (like 2-3 inches away) I can't make out any pixels on the thing. It's ALMOST 1080p on a portable screen, I'm pretty sure he has a right to brag about having the highest pixel density of any portable device on the market.
vanzant38Jan 26, 2012
Yes. I have one. And YES he did stretch the truth about the iPod Touch 4 screen. FACT.
smokezzSep 8, 2010
The iPod, the iPhone, etc are NOT a gaming platform. Duh.
And yes, I really dislike the new Digg as well... coming here less and less.
poopmonger47Sep 8, 2010
Mr Jobs is looking at the sales from a sales point of view, ignoring key demographics and important statistics. his comparisons with like-for-like gaming platforms will always be misconstrewed as other devices have a narrower target audience
nickm68Sep 8, 2010
The answer to any Steve Jobs related question can be answered like thus...
Because he is a douche.
zachworSep 8, 2010
When has Steve and company not put spin on everything they do? All companies do it. Remember when the Mac had IBM processors and Steve kept saying they were just as fast, just as comparable to an Intel processor? Then all of a sudden they switch to Intel processors, and guess what! We are seeing speeds of up to 2x faster! Well what about my IBM processor Steve? I thought you said this was just as good. As always, don't believe everything a company says about its products.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
torisutanSep 9, 2010
Your IBM processor was just as fast as Intel processors, if not faster, for a long time. Then Dual-Core and hyperthreaded processors came out, and the PowerPC architecture became obsolete (it would have cost too much to make a PowerPC processor capable of the same speed as a new Intel, though it would certainly have been capable of higher speeds for the same amount of power use just because of the nature of the architecture)
torisutanSep 9, 2010
The thing is, Jobs is still right. The iPod Touch is the best bang for the buck among portable systems. It's only $229 for the new 8GB model with HD display and video recording and compatibility with almost all existing iPod accessories, whereas the DS Lite starts at $129 but lacks internal storage, HD screen or camera and has very few accessories, and the PSP-Go is $179 but offers no accessories or internal storage, and no camera or HD screen.
The DS is largely a "younger" person's portable game player, and not many of its titles appeal to more mature audiences, not to mention the fact that it lacks the same multimedia capabilities of the PSP and the iPod Touch.
The PSP offers more mature titles for gamers but suffers from a control scheme that console and computer gamers would consider "insufficient", especially when you consider that most of its titles are just portable versions of console games. Those games were originally conceived of for systems with 2 analog stick/buttons, 4 shoulder buttons, a D-Pad, and the Square, Triangle, Circle, X buttons (or A,B,X,Y for xbox). It simply doesn't translate to a good experience when you remove part of the controls.
The iPod Touch has games that are developed specifically for it, with control schemes generated from intuitive actions, and while it isn't capable of the same graphics or speed as the PSP (though I believe it's about equal to the DS if not better) the games are designed to be more addictive and fun for short bursts of play. It also has a wide range of titles, from children's games with fluff and rainbows to adult titles with blood and gore, and the ideal part of that is that they cost about $5 on average for a decent game, and $10-$15 for the best games (which far outclass other titles). That's loads cheaper than the PSP and DS titles, and there's no physical media to lose or break because every game is stored on the internal drive.
Then there's the issue of development. The DS and PSP both have strict developer rules, like the iOS is famous for, but they also have extremely high developer costs. The iOS only costs $100 for the right to publish a game, but the developer kit is free and you are welcome to use it to develop as many apps as you like. There is even the ability to insert ads into your apps and games if you want to offer them for cheap or free, so you are virtually guaranteed revenue as long as your game is popular (and most free titles are). The DS and PSP have the problem of not selling many titles, except those from franchises or from well-known and well-funded developers, because people don't have interest in any other games. In a way, you could say that the iOS games are so popular among developers because they've managed to lower the bar for portable game quality in the minds of consumers, so they take less effort to sell than the PSP and DS, which have gamers that expect a minimum level of quality and playability in their games (they do spend upwards of $25 on new titles after all). Gamers on the iOS devices pay $1 for their games usually and play them much more often (though for shorter play sessions) than the gamers on other portable systems.
Steve Jobs first changed the computer industry with the iMac, which made computers cool and personal as opposed to simply towering grey/tan boxes, and also demonstrated the value of a tightly controlled system. Then he changed the MP3 player industry with the iPod, which offered more storage and better usability than any player at the time, and had a design that stood out among the crowd of black and silver. Next he changed the music industry with iTunes, which offered more music than any store or other website with a la carte pricing, something the music industry had never considered as a way of making money. After that he changed the cell phone industry with the iPhone by taking away phone development from the carriers and giving it to the hardware manufacturers, which resulted in giving consumers better phones that the carriers could charge more to use. Honestly, the only reason any of you Android fanboys have the phones you do is because Apple opened up the possibility by changing how carriers deal with developing phones, because otherwise we'd still all have phones that cost $15 to make with 2 inch screens and .5 megapixel cameras, no internet access, no third-party apps, etc.
Now it appears he's changed the gaming industry and even the software industry with the App Store, which offers developers both experienced and new to create niche games and apps that people will actually use for specific purposes, many of which replace hours of internet searches with a simple tap of a button. What next? With the release of the new Apple TV, will we see him change the movie rental industry to move away from Blockbuster and NetFlix DVD distribution to a more streamlined broadband video streaming solution? Will the next iteration include a better wireless system to stream 1080p content instead of just 720p? Who knows? But with Steve Jobs it's hard to tell what he'll do next to change our industries' ideas of what consumers want.
I should note, I'm not a Steve Jobs fanboy, I'm simply stating the facts about what the iOS represents, what Steve Jobs has been responsible for in the past, and that the markets and media are giving every indication that his statement "the iPod Touch is the #1 portable gaming device on the market" is correct, if not in sales then in potential and user satisfaction.
zunipusSep 11, 2010
No Digg. The guy missed the point: Portable Game Sales.
Silly TechTard.