nytimes.com— Mitt Romney said that he was concerned about “middle-income Americans.” He certainly has a funny way of showing it.
Feb 4, 2012View in Crawl 4
this is a good example of why we need to stop voting in rich people to represent us. sorry, but they really do live in a different world. and thus, they cannot adequately represent the average american. you can't expect a man like romney to relate to people living paycheck to paycheck.
Romney is a two-faced liar, just like the rest of the candidates with the exception of Ron Paul. Unfortunately we all know that Ron Paul has no prayer of winning the presidency anytime soon, simply because he is not on the payroll/on the take
Let's not forget the fact that he is a total nutjob. Of course, his fellow nutjobs would rather believe in some sort of conspiracy, since that let's them pretend that they are actually legitimate instead of a bunch of self-absorbed, spoiled children in somewhat adult bodies.
He's not a nutjob, just misunderstood. Some of his ideas are a little bit "out there," but honestly, that's what we need. Have you noticed the past several presidents and administrations have made things worse? Have continued on the same paths as the administrations before them?
Paul believes in a small federal government, more states rights, less overseas defense spending, less government intervention. He wants to end the war on marijuana and reexamine the war on drugs. He wants to get out of other country's business and worry about our own country; you know, the one that has been falling apart for decades.
Just because you don't understand him doesn't mean he's a nutjob. There is no conspiracy. Just a bunch of people who think they know what Paul is all about, but don't.
blklightningFeb 4, 2012
this is a good example of why we need to stop voting in rich people to represent us. sorry, but they really do live in a different world. and thus, they cannot adequately represent the average american. you can't expect a man like romney to relate to people living paycheck to paycheck.
usarugulaFeb 4, 2012
I'll just leave this here:
Romney Paid $0.00 in Gift Taxes on $100 Million to Sons
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/02/1061144/-Romney-Paid-$000-in-Gift-Taxes-on-$100-Million-to-Sons
jaketyson85Feb 5, 2012
u mad cuz u too lazy to do the homework to find out how to work the system to ur advantage legally? haters gone hate. dont hate rom for bein a baller.
Closed AccountFeb 4, 2012
Romney is a two-faced liar, just like the rest of the candidates with the exception of Ron Paul. Unfortunately we all know that Ron Paul has no prayer of winning the presidency anytime soon, simply because he is not on the payroll/on the take
publiclurkerFeb 4, 2012
Let's not forget the fact that he is a total nutjob. Of course, his fellow nutjobs would rather believe in some sort of conspiracy, since that let's them pretend that they are actually legitimate instead of a bunch of self-absorbed, spoiled children in somewhat adult bodies.
dustinthewind2Feb 4, 2012
He's not a nutjob, just misunderstood. Some of his ideas are a little bit "out there," but honestly, that's what we need. Have you noticed the past several presidents and administrations have made things worse? Have continued on the same paths as the administrations before them?
Paul believes in a small federal government, more states rights, less overseas defense spending, less government intervention. He wants to end the war on marijuana and reexamine the war on drugs. He wants to get out of other country's business and worry about our own country; you know, the one that has been falling apart for decades.
Just because you don't understand him doesn't mean he's a nutjob. There is no conspiracy. Just a bunch of people who think they know what Paul is all about, but don't.
FrankLuskaFeb 5, 2012
Lurker just likes to spread his hate around, makes him feel good, important or something.
miklkitFeb 4, 2012
The Pauls are unelectable because of:
Laissez-faireyland economic policies
Racism
Anti-women and children
FrankLuskaFeb 5, 2012
Lurker, is that you?
garbagedumpFeb 4, 2012
Taxes and charity are two different things. Romney is very charitable. That is FACT.
publiclurkerFeb 4, 2012
Only when it benefits himself.
happilymarried_usaFeb 4, 2012
omg...