So NASA (that little organization formed with former Nazi’s during “Operation Paperclip”) is going to be firing a weapon at the moon. Meanwhile, the so-called “press” misses the history. Project A119: “Researchers struggled in vain to find any pretext, any shred of legitimate scientific value, to glean from this sickening display of militarist impunity.”… “Twenty years before a powerful syndicate of military-industrial criminals conspired to plant a US flag on the Moon, a similar clique of madmen plotted to fire a nuclear warhead-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile at the lunar face. Code-named ‘Project A119′, this plan devised by Cold War-era Air Force and weapons manufacturers called for a massive nuclear explosion that would be clearly visible from anywhere on earth. ...But the sole objective of Project A119 was to terrorize into submission every human on the planet (especially those who had never heard of Hiroshima or Nagasaki) with a demonstration of how the US ruling class was technologically adept and morally bankrupt enough to commit such an unimaginable poetic atrocity. <a class="user" href="http://www.counterpunch.org/darksideofthemoon08212009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.counterpunch.org/darksideofthemoon08212 ...</a> Back in 1958 with all those liberals running around, unlike today, the project was rejected because, “Had the project been made public there would have been an outcry” said Project A119’s leader, Dr. Leonard Reiffel. <a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/may/14/spaceexploration.theobserver" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/may/14/spac ...</a> To paraphrase Truman, “The only thing new on the moon, is the history that we don’t know.”
thcobbsOct 6, 2009
That's what she said...
kronos6948Oct 6, 2009
It's because the US still thinks that the lights that were found all over were terrorist attacks. We're just retaliating now.
billb914Oct 7, 2009
I call it the Alan Parson's Project
snoogsOct 7, 2009
Celebrate the birth of your country by blowing up a small portion of it.
sentinel105Oct 7, 2009
Peter Griffin's Bunker Busting Mega Ultra Super Ice Water Moon Crust Searching Lunar Surface Blasting Debris Blowing.....
meeksamOct 7, 2009
Leave the moon alone! :'( Whatever goes up will come down.
d1donlyseanOct 7, 2009
It looks like a space station... Thats far to big to be a space station...Turn the ship around... yea, I think your right.
thiagoleiteOct 8, 2009
do we really want to upset the underground moon aliens?
simplemaxOct 8, 2009
So NASA (that little organization formed with former Nazi’s during “Operation Paperclip”) is going to be firing a weapon at the moon. Meanwhile, the so-called “press” misses the history. Project A119: “Researchers struggled in vain to find any pretext, any shred of legitimate scientific value, to glean from this sickening display of militarist impunity.”… “Twenty years before a powerful syndicate of military-industrial criminals conspired to plant a US flag on the Moon, a similar clique of madmen plotted to fire a nuclear warhead-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile at the lunar face. Code-named ‘Project A119′, this plan devised by Cold War-era Air Force and weapons manufacturers called for a massive nuclear explosion that would be clearly visible from anywhere on earth. ...But the sole objective of Project A119 was to terrorize into submission every human on the planet (especially those who had never heard of Hiroshima or Nagasaki) with a demonstration of how the US ruling class was technologically adept and morally bankrupt enough to commit such an unimaginable poetic atrocity. <a class="user" href="http://www.counterpunch.org/darksideofthemoon08212009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.counterpunch.org/darksideofthemoon08212 ...</a> Back in 1958 with all those liberals running around, unlike today, the project was rejected because, “Had the project been made public there would have been an outcry” said Project A119’s leader, Dr. Leonard Reiffel. <a class="user" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/may/14/spaceexploration.theobserver" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2000/may/14/spac ...</a> To paraphrase Truman, “The only thing new on the moon, is the history that we don’t know.”
Closed AccountOct 9, 2009
To the moon, Alice!