That's the point, though. Some things CAN be batch-relabelled, but the identifier that tells you to whether a file is "television" as opposed to "movie" is not one of those.
In the short-run it still perpetuates one system, as they were always accusing iTunes of. They're hoping to hold out long enough, continue to try to sway public opinion, and build competition in the long run, though.
Yes actually, I like supporting artists I like... I wouldn't listen to nearly as much new music if I didn't download it first, I'm not paying for something I haven't sampled. And as for carrying on using the non DRM versions yes, I hate being restricted in what I can and cannot do with something that I own.Thanks anyway
You just said they dropped DRM, and then went on to explain how they did not drop DRM.I'm just being a picky bastard. You're alright with me, anyway, man.
cthellisMay 1, 2008
It's a good thing that they don't, then.
cthellisMay 1, 2008
The truth is out there...! (Just not in your post.)(Mmm... X-Files movie...)
cthellisMay 1, 2008
That's the point, though. Some things CAN be batch-relabelled, but the identifier that tells you to whether a file is "television" as opposed to "movie" is not one of those.
cthellisMay 1, 2008
In the short-run it still perpetuates one system, as they were always accusing iTunes of. They're hoping to hold out long enough, continue to try to sway public opinion, and build competition in the long run, though.
fozzdogMay 2, 2008
Yes actually, I like supporting artists I like... I wouldn't listen to nearly as much new music if I didn't download it first, I'm not paying for something I haven't sampled. And as for carrying on using the non DRM versions yes, I hate being restricted in what I can and cannot do with something that I own.Thanks anyway
bizarrojackMay 2, 2008
You just said they dropped DRM, and then went on to explain how they did not drop DRM.I'm just being a picky bastard. You're alright with me, anyway, man.