What a worthless post. Anyone who has ever worked with Flash can see it's obviously not Flash. Furthermore, what is so great about this site? Why don't people actually gawk over the incredibly beautiful things some people actually can do with Flash? Ever seen the Level Vodka site? Ever seen any of the other dozens and dozens of Flash sites posted on "best of the web" sites. This site is ugly, basic, and too simplistic. Granted, I can understand it's a demonstration of a technology, or set of technologies... but who cares if you can re-write DOS through XHTML. It's already been created a long time ago. Do something new!
the thing i dont like about some flash sites *coughfusedottv*cough* is they are hard to navigate, which is why i don't visit those sites often.This site looked cool.
What is the goal of doing things "without flash" if it is not to be more accessible ?Javascript is OK, but it needs alternatives, for example "true" links. Of course it is not the case here.
funkpuckerFeb 16, 2006
What a worthless post. Anyone who has ever worked with Flash can see it's obviously not Flash. Furthermore, what is so great about this site? Why don't people actually gawk over the incredibly beautiful things some people actually can do with Flash? Ever seen the Level Vodka site? Ever seen any of the other dozens and dozens of Flash sites posted on "best of the web" sites. This site is ugly, basic, and too simplistic. Granted, I can understand it's a demonstration of a technology, or set of technologies... but who cares if you can re-write DOS through XHTML. It's already been created a long time ago. Do something new!
ahoierFeb 17, 2006
the thing i dont like about some flash sites *coughfusedottv*cough* is they are hard to navigate, which is why i don't visit those sites often.This site looked cool.
baltakateiFeb 17, 2006
ouchies... my CPU...
calimoFeb 17, 2006
What is the goal of doing things "without flash" if it is not to be more accessible ?Javascript is OK, but it needs alternatives, for example "true" links. Of course it is not the case here.
sleepwalkerFeb 23, 2006
you can see another site using the same technique at <a class="user" href="http://www.petersonfoto.com">http://www.petersonfoto.com</a>