scaryideas.com — "Hundreds of Volunteers Went Out Into the streets of Lima, discretely tagging these stickers on numerous unknowing pedestrians, whom, were later to discover the stickers pasted on their backs." Really clever marketing or a campaign gone too far?
Aug 9, 2007 View in Crawl 4
ramongAug 9, 2007
Hey, it creates awareness, DUGG!Now, if the sticker would just say: "HIV+" then there would be hell to pay.
ubuwalker31Aug 10, 2007
Interesting how the parent poster was talking about criminal assault...not suing somebody under civil law. In almost all places, if you touch someone in an offensive, unwanted way, it is an assault or battery. Malice isn't the type of intent that is needed...just the general intent to touch the person or to cause the contact.
zaffuhAug 10, 2007
lol.good one, you got me.brb im jacking off to the macy's catalog
zaffuhAug 10, 2007
its been said before, he didn't make it up.
jwigumAug 10, 2007
Shh, that's not what they want to hear!It's ironic that people treat "communicable" diseases as something that just happens. You're right, there's nothing unethical about sex. Depending on your views, it's very possible for the way people go about sex to be unethical. The simple solution to not getting any STD(or, *gasp* pregnant) is to not sleep around.
alanlivingstonAug 10, 2007
But don't you see, I didn't have sex with the person that gave me the sticker. They walked up to me and unknowingly put the sticker on me.Perhaps you have sex without knowing it but I don't. If you do, you deserve HIV.'tard! Get out of our gene pool!
pskyyyJul 5, 2009
I don't like this one......
Closed AccountJul 5, 2009
It's unethical, especially given a stigma attached to AIDS.Analogous ideas: "you may be homosexual" or "you might have had unprotected sex with a hooker", or "you might have cancer" or "you may be beating your wife". More obvious why it's wrong now?