nytimes.com — "Shares of Yahoo fell to their lowest level in nearly two years in after-hours trading yesterday as it reported weak revenue from Internet search advertising..." "Google, which continues to increase its share of both users and advertising revenue, produces 40 percent more revenue from each search than Yahoo does"
Jul 19, 2006 View in Crawl 4
davdavJul 20, 2006
noregistration3password
fatdog789Jul 20, 2006
With all the Adsense spam domains out there and the Adsense click fraud, and the complete and utter lack of transparency in the whole Adsense system, I'm not suprised that Google makes more revenue. Seriously, Nixon was more open about his plans than Google is about Adsense. And when Nixon is more open than you are, you've got a very serious, very evil problem.Adsense = Spamoverload.
kaiseraceJul 20, 2006
I'm surprised. So many people use AdSense that it seems so spammish. I'm surprised they found this. But whatever...Yahoo is plenty good.
dognoseJul 20, 2006
Yahoo is over a year behind Google in matching their ads to the content of publishers. AdSense rocks, YPN is a complete failure so far.
digi7al64Jul 20, 2006
At $400US a year to be in the directory and half hearted search program which favours those who pay. I say well done. Yahoo! has got what they deserve.
Closed AccountJul 20, 2006
and yet googles ads are nothing more then plan text?some advertisers would have us believe the intarweb can't survive without pages full of large graphics and flashing bulls**t.i say and as it seems google knows... ad relevance is FAR more important to actually making those ads worthwhile.
brokendrumJul 20, 2006
Kind of ironic Yahoo justifies their directory inclusion price by using a metric supplied by Google.
angler8890Jul 20, 2006
Yahoo is doing pretty well considering it is not <a class="user" href="http://www.ppof.info/sitemap.htm">http://www.ppof.info/sitemap.htm</a> it's main area of business.Yes. who can say no.
dacheetahJul 20, 2006
'cept it seems broken already, either that or I'm REALLY bad at typing.Am I the only one who can't stand needing to register to a news site just to read the news?