In other words: Audacious supports more file-types.Since, Audacious is a fork, the difference is code size will be very little.You can discuss the resources, GTK1 is faster, when all your apps are running GTK1. Otherwise XMMS actually uses _more_ memory.
I dual boot between XP and Kubuntu. I can leave Amarok with a playlist with 200+ songs and have it open at boot up without a major slowdown but Itunes nearly crashes XP on my old computer. I would say that Foobar does the best job of balancing features with size.
meneerrNov 18, 2007
In other words: Audacious supports more file-types.Since, Audacious is a fork, the difference is code size will be very little.You can discuss the resources, GTK1 is faster, when all your apps are running GTK1. Otherwise XMMS actually uses _more_ memory.
naterpokeNov 18, 2007
and you're just perpetuating that some needless OS is better than windows.
orph3usNov 18, 2007
a library that xmms used to depend on. :)
angrykeyboarderNov 18, 2007
Yuck. No thanks.
pgm_01Nov 18, 2007
I dual boot between XP and Kubuntu. I can leave Amarok with a playlist with 200+ songs and have it open at boot up without a major slowdown but Itunes nearly crashes XP on my old computer. I would say that Foobar does the best job of balancing features with size.
maccam94Nov 19, 2007
I think you meant "arrogant"
ssamNov 19, 2007
agreed. if i already have GTK2 loaded in RAM, i don't need GTK1 as well.also does GTK1 have any acessability and internationisation?
newwatch51Nov 19, 2007
The X refers to the X window system.
acidbassNov 20, 2007
No i didnt, if you re-read what i said, i said you gotta learn more technical crap to learn windows.Time to get your eyes checked?