Good article. Every single candidate running for President seems phony and not up to the task. While I disagree with some of Ron Paul's ideas and don't see how he can ever win, he's at least an interesting and authenic character.
I would suggest if Paul for some reason doesn't win the nomination that he not run as a third party...... Let's spend the next four years teaching the public and in 2012 lets put him in office for either a second term or his first term. If he runs as an "I" he will have no chance at all of running as a "R" in 2012 and thus he will not win. He already suffers the constant jabs of a 3rd party in the past. think of if this way if the economic issues which paul has warned the nation about occurs in the next four years he is a easy winner for 2012. Let's think long term and not a knee jerk reastion to what ifs. Just think by 2012 his meet up members who are active will be well over 800,000. By 2012 the issue with the NAU will be the subject of everone and no one will deny it. If Paul does't win Hillary will overrun the GOP nominee and we will see her sick little social experiment with our nation but she will not have the funds to carry it out so she will lead us to no where but down the tubes. Paul would splinter the donkey vote more so in 2012 if not exlected in 2009..... We could raise over 200,000,000 for Pual's second term or his first term for 2012. I'm not the kind of man who gives up but I do try to see the future as it must be if the first option isn't won. As I see it I think Paul will win 3 in IA and place 1 or 2nd in NH and a strong showing of 2 on other states then on super tuesday picking up many 1st place wins. Our nation is at stake and we must think short term and long term. If Paul does not win the nomination but runs as a third party he will not win as a third party but will bring more issues to the front of the table. But a run in 2012 will be nearly impossible for him to overcome the idea he ran as an "I" this year. I would rather help educate the people about Paul the next four years and get him in no later then 2012 then push the issues as an "I" and him not able to win this cycle or 2012..... By the way who is this Henry Lamb? I must have missed seing this mans articles I don't even know who he is but will google him to find out more. But thanks so much Mr. Lamb for your article.
mabelle2209Dec 30, 2007
Good article. Every single candidate running for President seems phony and not up to the task. While I disagree with some of Ron Paul's ideas and don't see how he can ever win, he's at least an interesting and authenic character.
darel99Dec 31, 2007
I would suggest if Paul for some reason doesn't win the nomination that he not run as a third party...... Let's spend the next four years teaching the public and in 2012 lets put him in office for either a second term or his first term. If he runs as an "I" he will have no chance at all of running as a "R" in 2012 and thus he will not win. He already suffers the constant jabs of a 3rd party in the past. think of if this way if the economic issues which paul has warned the nation about occurs in the next four years he is a easy winner for 2012. Let's think long term and not a knee jerk reastion to what ifs. Just think by 2012 his meet up members who are active will be well over 800,000. By 2012 the issue with the NAU will be the subject of everone and no one will deny it. If Paul does't win Hillary will overrun the GOP nominee and we will see her sick little social experiment with our nation but she will not have the funds to carry it out so she will lead us to no where but down the tubes. Paul would splinter the donkey vote more so in 2012 if not exlected in 2009..... We could raise over 200,000,000 for Pual's second term or his first term for 2012. I'm not the kind of man who gives up but I do try to see the future as it must be if the first option isn't won. As I see it I think Paul will win 3 in IA and place 1 or 2nd in NH and a strong showing of 2 on other states then on super tuesday picking up many 1st place wins. Our nation is at stake and we must think short term and long term. If Paul does not win the nomination but runs as a third party he will not win as a third party but will bring more issues to the front of the table. But a run in 2012 will be nearly impossible for him to overcome the idea he ran as an "I" this year. I would rather help educate the people about Paul the next four years and get him in no later then 2012 then push the issues as an "I" and him not able to win this cycle or 2012..... By the way who is this Henry Lamb? I must have missed seing this mans articles I don't even know who he is but will google him to find out more. But thanks so much Mr. Lamb for your article.
ryaanDec 31, 2007
Seriously dude if you have done the research you would be scared s**tless. I won't call you unpatriotic, your just underinformed.
clintontj72Dec 31, 2007
Make sure to join your local meetup group at ronpaul.meetup.com
strattspDec 31, 2007
Experience doing what? Accepting gifts? <a class="user" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGMxOGI1ZjIwYzgwNDRiNzEzYzI1NmI5NjFiZGM4MjE=">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGMxOGI1ZjIwY ...</a>keeping his son out of trouble? <a class="user" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/78241">http://www.newsweek.com/id/78241</a> Ron Paul is a tenth term congressman, Mike Huckabee got into politics in 1993, so actually Dr. Paul by himself has twice the experience of Huck.In his defense, Huck did make one of my favorite top 10 lists:<a class="user" href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007">http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announ ...</a>Do you know why the Dems want Huck as the Republican nominee? Because he would be so easy to beat.
dt07Jan 2, 2008
It's amazing how many media pundits are ignorant about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights...thank God Mr. lamb is not. Go Ron Paul 2008...