extremetech.com — The companies' first wireless HDMI setup is a standards-based system, predicated on the standards set forth by Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, and Sony in July of 2003. Other wireless HDMI technologies introduced to date have been proprietary, both Tzero and Analog Devices alleged.
Sep 5, 2006 View in Crawl 4
spaz007Sep 6, 2006
Wow lets add another standard that isn't supported yet... Great Idea....
urusaiSep 6, 2006
It sez it compresses the signal with JPEG2000. Oh great, so I get a big screen digital TV and get to see all the compression artifacts clearly. That, and they claim HDMI cables cost $100 "plus installation"...
mikecermSep 6, 2006
Sure, Monster Cables at Best Buy are expensive, but you can also get HDMI cables for dirt cheap at places like Monoprice. Remember, part of the beauty of digital signals is that you can can buy cheap cables and not lose any quality. Before you digg me down for saying "cheap is just as good", ask yourself how much you paid for the SATA cable for your hard drive. With digital cabling, quality rarely a concern.
endlessrayneSep 6, 2006
Now I just need to somehow incorporate a Faraday cage into my clothing....
superslothSep 6, 2006
Sweet. All the reliability of wireless, all the freedom of HDMI.
sunburntSep 6, 2006
@APThere are dozens of wireless signals coursing through your body 24 hours a day. Are you concerned about any of them? What makes wireless HDMI stand out?
aznboi04kSep 6, 2006
i think this is a bad idea. i have a feeling our videos and sound will ocassionally stutter. i'll use wire to get a perfect connection.