dailymail.co.uk — This puritanical nonsense is absolutely ridicules in my opinion. Seriously, the tattoo in question isn't even a photo-realistic depiction of nudity. It's B&W line-art! Let me ask, Would ANY of you diggers be offended by tiny, hand drawn breasts?
Feb 15, 2008 View in Crawl 4
dotlizardFeb 15, 2008
look, a few years ago, the entire country went into convulsions over a 1 second nip slip at the superbowl, so much so that the very next week the president went on t.v. telling us straight up there were no WMDs, and we didn't even notice for a couple more years! hells yeah Ms. Winehouse better cover up those sketchy boobies, you don't want the whole country going bats**t again and maybe electing a republican or something. everyone should be very careful not to stir up another episode of boob-related stupidity.
clickwirFeb 16, 2008
This is why I don't run things..... all tat's would need to be covered up. And it would be illegal for any more to be made.
Closed AccountFeb 16, 2008
When ever I see pictures of this hag my penis tries to craw back inside
barl0wFeb 16, 2008
She's gotta be one of the more ugliest people I've seen in a while - excluding her tattoos.
charlie55Feb 16, 2008
where does it say the grammys made her do it?
dylangaineFeb 18, 2008
those are very large areolas
dagoohFeb 19, 2008
Is that Jem, from Jem and the Holograms?
tkilgore04Feb 20, 2008
If I had to explain to a foreigner why people get sick of America, I think this says it all.
social101Mar 7, 2008
Yeh! i have consented to Trikkymikky. What else!!!!
esmond4May 22, 2008
<a class="user" href="http://www.genericsmed.com">http://www.genericsmed.com</a><a class="user" href="http://www.generics.ws">http://www.generics.ws</a>