finance.yahoo.com— An amendment based on Congressman Ron Paul?s House bill to audit the Federal Reserves was blocked by the Senate this week on procedural grounds.
Jul 8, 2009View in Crawl 4
Well...the two experts have spoken! I guess everything is fine and dandy and, once again, Government doesn't lie and is always right.Thanks, guys....we're really going to take your words to heart.Can you ummm...go away now?
seeking out Ron Paul articles then crying about how you always get buried and ron paul's supporters "game" Digg (conspiracy theory!1111) isn't spam, I guess. It's just entirely and utterly pathetic.Face it...no one agrees with you chickenhawk lunatics.
Yes, Linuxperson, that is how argumenting works: when your claim is that Ron Paul does not want individual liberties handled at the state level and your opponent gives you an example of where he does, the correct response is to ridicule your opponent for only proving you wrong with one example.If I had a clue I'd obviously have given you more examples. Such as, let's say, the right to life (death penalty).
shanevcJul 8, 2009
Audit the Fed, then End it! Go Ron Paul! H.R. 1207 has 250 cosponsors now! Let's keep the pressure on Congress.
acrinimirilJul 9, 2009
Yes, such as your comment.Your spam must be ended through education. Are you ready?
Closed AccountJul 9, 2009
Resolution passed in both the House and Senate as well as funding. Totally legal according to the Constitution
card51shortJul 9, 2009
Well...the two experts have spoken! I guess everything is fine and dandy and, once again, Government doesn't lie and is always right.Thanks, guys....we're really going to take your words to heart.Can you ummm...go away now?
card51shortJul 9, 2009
seeking out Ron Paul articles then crying about how you always get buried and ron paul's supporters "game" Digg (conspiracy theory!1111) isn't spam, I guess. It's just entirely and utterly pathetic.Face it...no one agrees with you chickenhawk lunatics.
Closed AccountJul 11, 2009
Yes, Linuxperson, that is how argumenting works: when your claim is that Ron Paul does not want individual liberties handled at the state level and your opponent gives you an example of where he does, the correct response is to ridicule your opponent for only proving you wrong with one example.If I had a clue I'd obviously have given you more examples. Such as, let's say, the right to life (death penalty).
bartboy919Aug 4, 2009
Iv'e read your LAWLS mother f**ker.