huffingtonpost.com— "But it's not fair!" Google's paralegal protested. "What if everyone whose account was cancelled sued Google?"
Mar 6, 2009View in Crawl 4
Every company that hides from its customers should suffer the same fate, over and over. The horses**t irrelevant E-mail responses are just step 1 of their infractions.OUR TIME IS NOT FREE, assh**ES. WHEN WE CALL, YOU WILL f**kING ANSWER.
A lot of people seem to be under the false impression that Google's ToS defines the legal relationship between Google and a publisher. Nothing could be further from the truth.Google's business actions, like anyone else's, are governed by city, county, state, federal, and international laws. No ToS document makes a company above the law.Google has closed the accounts of tens of thousands of small publishers all over the world and stolen their earnings. This practice has been going on for years. There is no legal basis for this theft, Google only acts this way because they can get away with it.Unfortunately, this is not Google's most egregious violation of it's legal and moral responsibilities. The company has a culture which simply has no respect for individual rights.
Did Bush ever come up to your house, punch you in the face, take back the tax rebate you got in the mail, and then tell you you're no longer an American citizen?
Took Microsoft a good few decades to be hated, and it took google only 1, and Microsoft didn't even pronounce a hypocrytical "Do no evil" like google.
zertonMar 7, 2009
The Huffington Post is kinda becoming a legit news source
paipiskiMar 7, 2009
Big Satan!
factsahoyMar 7, 2009
Every company that hides from its customers should suffer the same fate, over and over. The horses**t irrelevant E-mail responses are just step 1 of their infractions.OUR TIME IS NOT FREE, assh**ES. WHEN WE CALL, YOU WILL f**kING ANSWER.
higherlogicMar 7, 2009
<a class="user" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IRL" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IRL</a>
bobdigiMar 7, 2009
*shakes fist*
willspencerMar 8, 2009
A lot of people seem to be under the false impression that Google's ToS defines the legal relationship between Google and a publisher. Nothing could be further from the truth.Google's business actions, like anyone else's, are governed by city, county, state, federal, and international laws. No ToS document makes a company above the law.Google has closed the accounts of tens of thousands of small publishers all over the world and stolen their earnings. This practice has been going on for years. There is no legal basis for this theft, Google only acts this way because they can get away with it.Unfortunately, this is not Google's most egregious violation of it's legal and moral responsibilities. The company has a culture which simply has no respect for individual rights.
pikpikcarrotmonMar 8, 2009
Did Bush ever come up to your house, punch you in the face, take back the tax rebate you got in the mail, and then tell you you're no longer an American citizen?
vikstarMar 8, 2009
Took Microsoft a good few decades to be hated, and it took google only 1, and Microsoft didn't even pronounce a hypocrytical "Do no evil" like google.
dreadblogMar 12, 2009
*legalisingI'm not American....
amj121Apr 7, 2009
Many users got frustrated with Adsense.