Heh...you're not just buying the dead raghead! You're buying his inability to produce anymore raghead children and we're tossing in his land. Amortize it out and you'll see it's an excellent investment. ;-)
And of course, since this is Digg, it is marked as "possibly inaccurate", just because the truth doesn't match the point of view of a bunch of morons. It's a fact: the Iraqis are the one suffering, the dead US soldiers pale in comparison.
Inaccurate, 6 months ago, we had passed the 1 million dead Irakis. 2nd reason for inaccurate, why are 9/11 victims even in that graph?Oh, I see now, you're graphing every person that your Bush administration has killed for the greed of the banking/oil/military industrial cartel. Makes more sense now.Nevermind then, I can't really bury you now that you're so sincere.
Closed AccountMar 14, 2008
i don't get it.
Closed AccountMar 14, 2008
Heh...you're not just buying the dead raghead! You're buying his inability to produce anymore raghead children and we're tossing in his land. Amortize it out and you'll see it's an excellent investment. ;-)
smek2Mar 14, 2008
And of course, since this is Digg, it is marked as "possibly inaccurate", just because the truth doesn't match the point of view of a bunch of morons. It's a fact: the Iraqis are the one suffering, the dead US soldiers pale in comparison.
nwoantibodyMar 18, 2008
Inaccurate, 6 months ago, we had passed the 1 million dead Irakis. 2nd reason for inaccurate, why are 9/11 victims even in that graph?Oh, I see now, you're graphing every person that your Bush administration has killed for the greed of the banking/oil/military industrial cartel. Makes more sense now.Nevermind then, I can't really bury you now that you're so sincere.