royal.pingdom.com — If Mother Nature has anything to say, there simply are some places where you shouldn’t place a data center. Do you really want to have your servers where there is a high risk of earthquakes, tornadoes or hurricanes? We didn’t think so…
Jan 19, 2007 View in Crawl 4
transcendzJan 20, 2007
@Dsn989 : well, last answer, even if it gets interesting but can be boring for some people.In fact, you'll need fuel to bring your nuclear combustible to your power plants. BTW, Generators using fast neutrons (sorry for the spelling if it's not the right word) aren't ready yet and won't be until 2100, same for surgenerators (again, didn't check spelling) like ITER. During that time, we'll have to find solutions for the waste, and be sorry for our children...
h2d2Jan 20, 2007
Michigan is actually the whitest state on the map. No pun intended.
acecoolkatJan 20, 2007
Which is exactly why everyone SHOULD move their data centers to Montana, especially Missoula, because I'm here and I'm lonely... c'mon, you know it would be fun.
tito13kfmJan 20, 2007
"Downstream of Damns"I would also avoid placing your server downstream of s**ts.
osbjmgJan 21, 2007
bsavage3 - If there is a nuclear disaster, my job is at the very bottom of my "stuff I care about right now" list.
technopunditJan 21, 2007
This year.
mobilehavocFeb 1, 2007
<a class="user" href="http://www.duggmirror.com">http://www.duggmirror.com</a>