latinoreview.com — Ok, so I guess the news was a shock to all of us when it came to the sudden switch in casting from Terrence Howard to Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2. I still think it's probably because Terrence could be a total nutjob but that's my opinion, and I have a small brain so opinions like that are all I can come up with.
Oct 28, 2008 View in Crawl 4
synergyeOct 29, 2008
@neonoodle, the difference is that the new Incredible Hulk wasn't to continue a series, it was meant to act as if the first Incredible Hulk movie didn't exist(because it was terrible). The new movie was also done by a different studio.Iron Man was an awesome movie, and it's going to help keep up a series of movies by Marvel to create a new Marvel universe.
nowhereelseOct 29, 2008
One Tom Hanks (or its it James Stewart?) is enough. Don Cheadle is far more interesting.
thesnuffsterOct 29, 2008
I never was a part of you..
4ndr01dOct 29, 2008
Howard is almost as boring to watch as Common where is Djimon Hounsou when we need him!! Cheadle is a fine choice
zymophidethOct 29, 2008
This account has been closed by the user
dead777Oct 30, 2008
If I worked in Hollywood I'd be a big f**king dick too. Last I checked he wasn't a dick in Ironman. Baby wipes for life, baby wipes for life.
Closed AccountDec 31, 2008
Riiiiiiight. Just like Tom Hanks was a pretty good leading man in that too.Forgive them Cuba!