littlegreenfootballs.com— And New York’s WNBC.com calls these lunatics “activists.” (Complete with deranged comments from Truthers.)
May 29, 2007View in Crawl 4
Anyone who still believes that the WTC collapses were NOT the cause of the two plane crashes and the resulting fires et al is a loon, pure and simple. Despite the reams and reams of technical debunking of this, the one aspect of this that one can not dispute is this: Where did those thousands of people necessary to rig the two towers with explosives go?? None of them either through lingering guilt, drunkenness, disenfranchisement with their government, what have you, etc has decided to come forward since?? That from an administration who can't help but have leaks of the most minute and/or trivial of non-issues, save for one of this magnitude? This falls in line with the same "GWB and administration are morons" but at the same time they argue that they are the most cunning, manipulative administration ever. People, these ideas are complete opposites and the idea that one would present them is insane - you actually make the case against your own arguments!"All aboard the tin foil hat express!"
@stallionNow you choose to debate qualifications? You won't answer simple questions put to you, so now you challenge qualifications. Why is that?Because the answers are too simple to accept, there must be more involved. Can't answer my questions, so attack my intelligence, huh?When you start answering questions, I will too. I learned about gravity when I was in Kindergarten. It seems to have applied when the weight of the plane became intolerable on the girders and trusses. Kind of caused a building to fall down to the ground. Physics 000000001.
Passes? We don't need no stinken passes. We're Americans exercising an unalienable Right, goddamnit! The fuggin' corporate media whores are the only ones who should need passes, as they are imbibing in a priviledge, not a Right.
swrostmore: "mother jones' reporters are "radical activists"? Come on, you can do better than that. I mean, Jeff Gannon had a press pass, and he was a gay prostitute. So it must not be that hard to get one (press pass, not prostitute), as long as you have close ties to the White House."Just went with the first thing to come to mind, sorry if it not being a gay prostitute offends you.But thanks for backing my point that having press credentials doesn't prove the person is reasonable or even rational.
@stallion"Why do you think it would be "necessary" for thousands to rig the towers with explosives? Demolition crews can rig buildings to fall down with very few people involved."Buildings that are intentionally brought down by demolition crews are first COMPLETELY gutted (read "ALL Floors") of pretty much anything beyond the core structure - this is obviously not the case with the WTC since irregardless of your subsequent posts about engineers and power downs, etc, everyone who worked at WTC up until that morning had integral office spaces with NO ONE observing anything like this. Additionally, the number of explosives charges and the thousands of feet of wiring for same in a gutted building are extensive. Were it attempted in a non-gutted building, it would follow that wiring would be even more voluminous (you are talking about snaking wires as opposed to just running them through a vacant open space) which requires way more time and way more wire, and, therefore, way, way more people! I will also go out on a limb and guess that bringing down a non-gutted building would require more charges as well, but that's not even necessary to make my argument here.
@buddarien"Because that's what TROLLS like buddarien are wont to do."What would constitute a Troll on DIGG?? I was not aware that DIGG was a site borne out of an ideological goal. In practice, it may frequented (abused!) more by one side of the political spectrum than the other, but I have yet to see anywhere where that was its intended use.
adhrfMay 29, 2007
Anyone who still believes that the WTC collapses were NOT the cause of the two plane crashes and the resulting fires et al is a loon, pure and simple. Despite the reams and reams of technical debunking of this, the one aspect of this that one can not dispute is this: Where did those thousands of people necessary to rig the two towers with explosives go?? None of them either through lingering guilt, drunkenness, disenfranchisement with their government, what have you, etc has decided to come forward since?? That from an administration who can't help but have leaks of the most minute and/or trivial of non-issues, save for one of this magnitude? This falls in line with the same "GWB and administration are morons" but at the same time they argue that they are the most cunning, manipulative administration ever. People, these ideas are complete opposites and the idea that one would present them is insane - you actually make the case against your own arguments!"All aboard the tin foil hat express!"
buddarienMay 29, 2007
@stallionNow you choose to debate qualifications? You won't answer simple questions put to you, so now you challenge qualifications. Why is that?Because the answers are too simple to accept, there must be more involved. Can't answer my questions, so attack my intelligence, huh?When you start answering questions, I will too. I learned about gravity when I was in Kindergarten. It seems to have applied when the weight of the plane became intolerable on the girders and trusses. Kind of caused a building to fall down to the ground. Physics 000000001.
buddarienMay 30, 2007
@mrequyAh yes, anyone that ventures outside of the collective groupthink is tantamount to a troll.Good one!
dicktaterMay 30, 2007
Passes? We don't need no stinken passes. We're Americans exercising an unalienable Right, goddamnit! The fuggin' corporate media whores are the only ones who should need passes, as they are imbibing in a priviledge, not a Right.
johnrebMay 30, 2007
swrostmore: "mother jones' reporters are "radical activists"? Come on, you can do better than that. I mean, Jeff Gannon had a press pass, and he was a gay prostitute. So it must not be that hard to get one (press pass, not prostitute), as long as you have close ties to the White House."Just went with the first thing to come to mind, sorry if it not being a gay prostitute offends you.But thanks for backing my point that having press credentials doesn't prove the person is reasonable or even rational.
adhrfMay 30, 2007
@stallion"Why do you think it would be "necessary" for thousands to rig the towers with explosives? Demolition crews can rig buildings to fall down with very few people involved."Buildings that are intentionally brought down by demolition crews are first COMPLETELY gutted (read "ALL Floors") of pretty much anything beyond the core structure - this is obviously not the case with the WTC since irregardless of your subsequent posts about engineers and power downs, etc, everyone who worked at WTC up until that morning had integral office spaces with NO ONE observing anything like this. Additionally, the number of explosives charges and the thousands of feet of wiring for same in a gutted building are extensive. Were it attempted in a non-gutted building, it would follow that wiring would be even more voluminous (you are talking about snaking wires as opposed to just running them through a vacant open space) which requires way more time and way more wire, and, therefore, way, way more people! I will also go out on a limb and guess that bringing down a non-gutted building would require more charges as well, but that's not even necessary to make my argument here.
adhrfMay 30, 2007
@buddarien"Because that's what TROLLS like buddarien are wont to do."What would constitute a Troll on DIGG?? I was not aware that DIGG was a site borne out of an ideological goal. In practice, it may frequented (abused!) more by one side of the political spectrum than the other, but I have yet to see anywhere where that was its intended use.