hotair.com— The editor of Popular Mechanics, in his new book, debunks the myths of 9/11 that 36% of the american people now believe.
Aug 8, 2006View in Crawl 4
who posts this crap, like the 3rd story about these retarded theories today. Let's face it, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPEND. Stop fill in the blanks with (THE GOVERNMENT DID IT).
And no model will ever take into account all of reality. Your response shows clearly that you do not have a background in Engineering or Science. Models are supposed to simplify the world and predict what will happen, to have a complete model we would have to know the position and velocity of each individual atom, which is not possible. (Quantum physics, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle) You can never model this completely, forget about the whole thing and move on with your life.P.S. That key under the Caps lock button is called the shift key. Using it will make people respect you more.
Hoo boy....Neo went through a hell of an adjustment period when Morpheus ripped him out of the Matrix.Denial, repression & delusion are not your friends today. You are not a Jedi, yet.
Of course there is no way we know anything for absolute certain, reality is subjective by its very nature. I am not arguing that we need to know something with that level of certainty. All I am saying is that you can't even get beyond reasonable doubt with this because there is no evidence to support either claims. OK, I'll bite, what are your qualifications? Come on, what education lead you to your expert conclusions and made you the all seeing judgmental bafoon that you seem be?
None of this actually proves jack s**t. Terrorist hijack four commercial passenger jet airliners, government does nothing, knows nothing. Four commercial passenger jet airliners go off route, government does nothing, knows nothing. Something is not right here. When the first plane hit the world trade center, why didn't they investigate to see if there are any other planes that are off route. In any other instane where these types of planes when off their initial path, they had jets tracking that s**t ready to blow the s.o.b in less than 8 minutes. Four go off their path and the government didn't do nothing for 40 minutes. Plus if Castro can dodge 62 assisination by us, than we should be able to dodge something like this. The planes might have hit and they fell down obviously, but why they hit in the first place is where the conspirecy really lies.
"More like "It was used to legally enter World War II." We had no justification before then. It is believed that america used the same type of tactic to enter into WWI."That's just not true. The government doesn't need 'evidence' or some type of event to declare war. It's simply a vote by congress whether or not to declare war. It did not necessarily require Pearl Harbor. It was Isolationist factions in the US that were preventing us from partaking in the war in Europe. The same isolationst type people that allowed Hitler in the 30's to build up his army basically in front of the world against the treaty of versailles which germany signed. It wasn't a "tactic" of the US to use either the sinking of the Lusitania or the bombing of Pearl Harbor to go to war. It just made the vote to declare war that much easier. Let's assume that you are correct that Pearl Harbor made it legal to enter world war 2. How would the bombing of a US base by Japan legally allow us to instantly declare war on Germany and start sending troops?
boodieAug 9, 2006
as a flight attendant I can tell you it does work.... I have had bars at 35,000 feet
xotoxAug 9, 2006
Like the "war on terror," this is a story that will run and run and run.
stesunAug 9, 2006
who posts this crap, like the 3rd story about these retarded theories today. Let's face it, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPEND. Stop fill in the blanks with (THE GOVERNMENT DID IT).
theironbadgerAug 9, 2006
And no model will ever take into account all of reality. Your response shows clearly that you do not have a background in Engineering or Science. Models are supposed to simplify the world and predict what will happen, to have a complete model we would have to know the position and velocity of each individual atom, which is not possible. (Quantum physics, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle) You can never model this completely, forget about the whole thing and move on with your life.P.S. That key under the Caps lock button is called the shift key. Using it will make people respect you more.
vermifaxAug 9, 2006
Dayum. Alex called it.So dark, the Neo-Con of Man....
vermifaxAug 10, 2006
Hoo boy....Neo went through a hell of an adjustment period when Morpheus ripped him out of the Matrix.Denial, repression & delusion are not your friends today. You are not a Jedi, yet.
estebanAug 10, 2006
Of course there is no way we know anything for absolute certain, reality is subjective by its very nature. I am not arguing that we need to know something with that level of certainty. All I am saying is that you can't even get beyond reasonable doubt with this because there is no evidence to support either claims. OK, I'll bite, what are your qualifications? Come on, what education lead you to your expert conclusions and made you the all seeing judgmental bafoon that you seem be?
crazy3slAug 12, 2006
None of this actually proves jack s**t. Terrorist hijack four commercial passenger jet airliners, government does nothing, knows nothing. Four commercial passenger jet airliners go off route, government does nothing, knows nothing. Something is not right here. When the first plane hit the world trade center, why didn't they investigate to see if there are any other planes that are off route. In any other instane where these types of planes when off their initial path, they had jets tracking that s**t ready to blow the s.o.b in less than 8 minutes. Four go off their path and the government didn't do nothing for 40 minutes. Plus if Castro can dodge 62 assisination by us, than we should be able to dodge something like this. The planes might have hit and they fell down obviously, but why they hit in the first place is where the conspirecy really lies.
vermifaxAug 14, 2006
Congratulations! You just won a free copy of "Mein Kampf" and a Fox News baseball cap!!!
vermifaxAug 14, 2006
Sounds like you hate the Bush Propaganda Machine, also...
oficermantimberAug 16, 2006
<a class="user" href="http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons">http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons</a>
brdsofpreyAug 29, 2006
"More like "It was used to legally enter World War II." We had no justification before then. It is believed that america used the same type of tactic to enter into WWI."That's just not true. The government doesn't need 'evidence' or some type of event to declare war. It's simply a vote by congress whether or not to declare war. It did not necessarily require Pearl Harbor. It was Isolationist factions in the US that were preventing us from partaking in the war in Europe. The same isolationst type people that allowed Hitler in the 30's to build up his army basically in front of the world against the treaty of versailles which germany signed. It wasn't a "tactic" of the US to use either the sinking of the Lusitania or the bombing of Pearl Harbor to go to war. It just made the vote to declare war that much easier. Let's assume that you are correct that Pearl Harbor made it legal to enter world war 2. How would the bombing of a US base by Japan legally allow us to instantly declare war on Germany and start sending troops?
Closed AccountMay 14, 2008
Where's my f**king flying car.<a class="user" href="http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2007/08/gallery_hovercraft/popularMechanics.jpg">http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2007/08/gall ...</a>Why should we believe a magazine that makes up s**t all the time?
invictJul 9, 2008
It's not a myth guys..Come on it was real!<a class="user" href="http://www.charlesdavidshoesinfo.net">http://www.charlesdavidshoesinfo.net</a>
creynoldOct 13, 2008
<a class="user" href="http://digg.com/business_finance/making_easy_money_in_your_own_home">http://digg.com/business_finance/making_easy_money ...</a>
w3berDec 26, 2008
media this days... just f**king ask the mobile phone companies!!!
petrimaattaMar 18, 2009
Very interesting. Yes, its true, it is a conspiracy - AGAINST US.