thinkprogress.org — Rudy Giuliani was the most passionate, calling today’s sentencing “way out of line” and “grossly excessive.” Giuliani said the case against Libby was “incomprehensible” because “ultimately, there was no underlying crime involved.”
Jun 6, 2007 View in Crawl 4
qazzJun 6, 2007
Reason is so scary. Think emotionally.
shootdashitJun 6, 2007
ron paul showed intelligence on this question and most of all respect. they asked for yes and no answers and ron paul said "no" in respect to the other candidates. and f**k face rudy really pissed me off with this last night by doing whatever he wanted and not respecting the rules or his peers. we understand it's an issue for debate rudy. he showed me the leadership of bush by not listening and doing whatever he wanted without thinking of the others there on stage.
entropymanJun 6, 2007
The fact that Libby wasn't the original leaker makes his obstruction _worse_ not better. In addition to being criminal, it's criminally stupid to lie about a crime you didn't commit.It's almost as if Libby thought he was protecting Cheney... as if Libby thought Cheney was guilty and so fell on his sword to protect his master... now why in the world would Libby think that?
swrostmoreJun 6, 2007
the trial is ongoing, as Libby is in the process of appealing. I am confident that Bush will pardon him as the second that the appeal gets overturned.
swrostmoreJun 6, 2007
clinton was acquitted you apologist f**k. Libby should have absolutely been asked who was responsible for leaking the identity of a covert agent as an act of political retaliation, and he also should have answered the f**king question honestly.
jessestimpsonJun 6, 2007
Perhaps the Ron Paul talk seems a little smothering, but the difference here is time. There is only so much time before the primaries, and really, it's not very much. If Ron Paul's campaign people and the general public who support him do not work to get his name out, he will be further censored by the mainstream media until his campaign is forgotten.