healthfreedomusa.org — Dissenters beware. Also, not mentioned in vid, is the fact that kids deemed mentally ill via mandatory testing, can now be drugged with dangerous and largely untested psychoactive drugs, and parents who resist, run the risk of loosing custody of that child to the state where they may be used as experimental subjects in absence of informed consent.
Oct 4, 2007 View in Crawl 4
thecatcantalkOct 5, 2007
I'm sure the INTENTION of the FBI checklist was to exhort citizens to keep an eye out for wild-eyed whackos, but the wording is unfortunate, and way too broad, also vague. According to the quoted checklist, anyone who actually specialized in Constitutional law in law school, and whom expresses shock and horror at the present Administration's contempt for Constitutional law, would be a candidate for surveillance and/or wiretapping.Might this include the Federal Circuit Court (and military) judges whom have ruled that portions of the Patriot Act are demonstrably unconstitutional? How about persons whom note, in public discourse, that there IS no Constitutional theory of the "unitary executive"? The term "unitary executive" is one you will NEVER hear in law school, because it never existed, until a couple years ago, when the Bushies made it up. It's a 'unicorn'; impressive-sounding intellectual bulls**t, with no historical existence.This is what happens when a nation whose greatness was the fruit of British common law and culture gets taken over by tens of millions of immigrants from third-world military dictatorships, whom neither know nor care what they're destroying, as they take our country away from us, one vote at a time. Enoch Powell was right. We are becoming a Latin American banana republic, a kleptocracy, a nation in which nothing works, no one knows anything about what they do for a living, and no one has correct information about anything at all, thanks to Fox News, et al: Mexico with white slaves.When the common man's knowledge of his nation's history ceases to consist of any coherent narrative, then the youth's attitude to tradition consists only in wishing to destroy it. And that's how we wound up with a President who can't speak English like a grown-up.
badassninjaOct 5, 2007
You guys don't get it. If a business wants to allow smoking indoors then that should be the owners right. If there is a need for smokeless buildings then some places will have a no smoking rule. What we don't need is the government coming in and telling us what we can and can not do as a business owner.
timthegreatOct 6, 2007
We need to get an IP and catch this guy!
solidcubeOct 6, 2007
I'm not quite so pessimistic about it. Every time they push forward like this, there is a backlash. This one is going to be a real doozy. Sooner or later there's going to be a draft. Then there's going to be a Kent State.
obliviousfoolOct 6, 2007
I don't know much about Lexapro, but I've seen the clinical benefit of other anti-depressants. It's up to the person involved to weigh the risks and benefits of having something like that in their body. Of course, anything that floods your mind with serotonin is going to feel good, but that is really the idea in this case. Either way, don't ever stop taking an SSRI immediately! If you choose to stop taking it, ween yourself off slowly.
Closed AccountOct 23, 2007
Plenty of conspiracists are schizoid. Nobody's saying that all conspiracists are schizoid, but paranoid schizoids are much more commonly conspiracists BY THEIR VERY NATURE.
adamgeldNov 8, 2007
Incredible, disgusting, inhuman, undemocratic, words that barely come close to describing compulsory medication. How much did the drug companies give in bribes to our elected officials for them to support this?
adamgeldNov 8, 2007
You cannot trust doctors to always act in your best interests. Humans often act in their own interests, rather than those of others.
adamgeldNov 8, 2007
I was personally nearly put into acoma by a corrupt and immoral doctor who prescribed me two times the maximum dosage of Zoloft for my chronic depression. I asked him why he was prescribing me two times the maximum dosage, he did not have an a good answer and brushed me off. Less than two weeks later I was found on the floor of my room barely breathing and cold as ice.If it was not for my brother, I may very well have died because of his incompetence. His name was Dr. Desai, I do not know his first name. That is not the only corrupt doctor I have met, either. There were several others.I have been on countless medications for my severe depression, only one of them helped. The others either did not work very well if at all, given me severe seizures, nearly killed me, or made me WISH that they killed me. "Modern" medications are not very effective, and usually produce more complications and side-effects then they help you.
adamgeldNov 8, 2007
It is also impossible to get an unbiased view from someone else about what you feel. They also do not personally know how you feel, they only know what they observe and what you tell them. That is often not enough, and can in some cases prove fatal.
adamgeldNov 8, 2007
That is not necessarily evidence that the medications themselves amplify the problems, and could simply mean they were not effective in treating the patient. But in either case, it means the medications were not effective in treating the patients ailments. That is because medications are primitive, and drug companies do little testing of their products.Human testing is both expensive and extremely dangerous, so the pharmaceutical companies usually do not do even remotely adequate testing of their drugs. Wide-spread usage of untested and ineffective drugs would be very dangerous, but it would exponentially increase profits. And that is what they care about most, themselves, not you.