youtube.com — This is an archive to view recent video clips of mainstream media whores attacking Rosie O'Donnell and others for questioning the US government and the official version of 9/11. A similar archive can be found at this link: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=LoudStudio
Apr 4, 2007 View in Crawl 4
stallion4Apr 4, 2007Submitter
They're not only treating Rosie like dirt. They're also treating every person who questions their government like dirt, including thousands of 9/11 victims' family members who are questioning the government's official version of 9/11. Every time the media whores call Rosie "crazy" for talking about 9/11, they are calling these family members crazy too. By the way the second link I posted to the other video archive should have had an "S" at the end of it. Here it is again:<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=LoudStudios">http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=LoudStudios</a>Here's their website for more vids and info:<a class="user" href="http://stoplying.ca/">http://stoplying.ca/</a>
dshplsApr 4, 2007
Guys here's a way to prevent the NWO and Orly from enslaving us all! <a class="user" href="http://www.thethirteenthstep.com/stfu/tinfoil-hat.jpg">http://www.thethirteenthstep.com/stfu/tinfoil-hat.jpg</a>Find the truth!
iamatruthaddictApr 4, 2007
Thanks for the story stallion4!
psychaotic333Apr 9, 2007
When Bill o'Liely goes so far as to suggest that Charlie Sheen "ought to look out for his son" if he stands on the side of free speech and free investigative journalism and narrates the (stellar, non-kooky) Loose Change, I believe this counts as *making a public threat on a child's life*, even though Reilly quickly leapt in and said "now this is not a threat". It's like saying "f**k" and then claiming "now, that was not an obscenity". Why should implausible denial get him off the hook? Now he's all over Rosie O'Donnell. He also looks very nervous...and is saying idiotic things like it's all right to say anti-American things when not at war, but if we're at war (remember, ALL this warring which was supposedly excused by 9/11) and someone claims in the mainstream media that it was an inside job, they ought to be fired? All I can say is, whence come the day when Bill says something a little too controversial himself? Does he get permitted to say it? He's getting clobbered even by the guests who claim to agree with him, and get their opinions aired just because they do so; there's sneaky, clever insertation of "well, Bill, half the country agrees with Rosie". And the New York Times latest poll claims 80 % - of course, polls are sketchy, but it still says SOMETHING.I've been a truthseeker since 2002, one of the earliest transpiracy-researcher readers. That's a good response to anyone using the Conspiracy Theory phrase: respond by quietly saying, I do not theorize conspiracy, I research transpiracy. I want to know what transpired, like any patriotic American ought to. The military takes an oath to protect us from all enemies FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC and that is not followed by "provided the domestic enemy isn't ensconced in the White House". I am waiting to see the veterans get more involved with this.