thinkprogress.org — At the Fox News GOP presidential debate tonight, Carl Cameron asked a NH woman whether she wanted gay marriage banned. Her answer -- “Absolutely not” -- received cheers from the audience. When Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) then said he believes the nation should have a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, the audience loudly booed.
Sep 6, 2007 View in Crawl 4
gadrenSep 6, 2007
"Foundational institution?" Does that even mean anything?
Closed AccountSep 6, 2007
True, but he's running in a Republican primary where the candidates are basically in a giant pissing contest over who can torture Muslims the most and who can marginalize minorities the most.
frnnkdlxxSep 6, 2007
If you didn't pay minful attention properly. You'd recognize its simililar to the initiation of insightfulness. The creation of potential........ Y-you know what... I ..It means he's looking to the future.... .... I ... think he meant... *head explodes*
frnnkdlxxSep 6, 2007
I don't know what the arguments are about. The constitution clearly spells out that no person shall be deprived of their *persons*, *places*, and *effects*. That sort of outlines that they shall not be obstructed from "practicing their love with women", to quote George Bush. It is not traditional in an organized sense, but they are capable of caring for their own lives. They are responsible for themselves. And shall not be restricted from operating within society as they see fit as long as they harm no others in the process. Plus, the federal government should have no say so over the matters of the individual living within separate states. That's a GROOOSSS obstruction of the office he seeks to attain. He should be stopped right there and thrown off the podium. Follow the constitution pal. Back in the 1700-1800's, when somebody proposed something like that, they were literally shot!