washingtonpost.com— Open the story and click on the photo to enlarge it. Now go to http://securitywizardry.com/radar.htm . Look familiar? Found this info here: http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1097
Feb 6, 2006View in Crawl 4
It's really hard to come up with more than about 1 "authentic" looking image in 1 - 2 years. So you can't be upset if someone recycled the "imagery" wih the country and pie charts. And furthermore: why should things have changed since "Our Man in Havana" by Graham Greene anyway? He had such a hard time with them vacuum cleaners.
interesting. I found the priceless knockoff thing a little snarky, considering a lot of people working there probably do contribute as volunteers to the dshield database i'd bet, otherwise why would they think of it? Also. an above comment had it right .. whats up there is "just for the press". Though i bet they use it along with a bunch of other tools
swisswuffFeb 6, 2006
It's really hard to come up with more than about 1 "authentic" looking image in 1 - 2 years. So you can't be upset if someone recycled the "imagery" wih the country and pie charts. And furthermore: why should things have changed since "Our Man in Havana" by Graham Greene anyway? He had such a hard time with them vacuum cleaners.
teddziubaFeb 7, 2006
staged for publicity. no digg.
mikesum32Feb 7, 2006
Your IP (192.168.100.1) appears as anattacker 2 times in the DShield database.Oh noes ! I'll have to block it with my f!rewa|| !
iammikeFeb 15, 2006
interesting. I found the priceless knockoff thing a little snarky, considering a lot of people working there probably do contribute as volunteers to the dshield database i'd bet, otherwise why would they think of it? Also. an above comment had it right .. whats up there is "just for the press". Though i bet they use it along with a bunch of other tools
s3cretsquirrelSep 21, 2006
who is to say that this wasn't a 'prop' designed to make the public think that they are a bunch of fools?