washingtonpost.com — The numbers "suggest a staggeringly high rate of false positives with respect to the identification of supposed terrorists. This really confirms the long-standing fear that this list is inaccurate and ultimately ineffective as an anti-terror tool."
Aug 25, 2007 View in Crawl 4
zarchonAug 26, 2007
Dude, your comment is just stupid. Let me translate your comment for you.Oh oh, someone may be on the terrorist list who isn't. How terrible of you Cygnus for not caring. I hope you are put on that list falsely and then fist raped. Why can't you be more caring?Do you see the hypocrisy of your point of view? No, I didn;t think you could.
starlessknightAug 26, 2007
Couldn't they just blame it on the "Liberals" for keeping them from doing "all that was necessary" and/or "emboldening the terrorists?"
schroederAug 26, 2007
Actually, those who always vote for the left or the right are the "sheep". Those in the middle are free thinking individuals who vote for those they feel best represent them. They don't readily buy in to whatever their politician sells them. Each side has trouble getting those in the middle because they are the ones they need to convince, party members just follow.I don't see how Iraq was ever good for the country. Now there is a hot bed for terrorism that Saddam had in check. There hare thousands dead who would be alive. There is a destroyed country that has to be rebuilt. There is the highest debt ever to face the American People that is owed to China. And now there is rumor of war on Iran. There is no money or soldiers for 2 wars. All the while Osama/Afganistan is ignored and those in power and their contractor ties (haliburton) are ripping off Americans increasing the debt even greater and making them richer.
mejogidAug 26, 2007
You seem to be forgetting the RIAA...
bemenakerAug 27, 2007
DUH!!!!!!!sorry biggest caps i have