query.nytimes.com — A San Diego stock adviser who is accused of bribing an F.B.I. agent to give him confidential government information may have had prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks, a federal prosecutor said yesterday. But a judge disregarded that contention and the advisers lawyer called the allegation ludicrous. Is It? Kucinich will investigate...
Feb 22, 2008 View in Crawl 4
cheeseheadFeb 23, 2008
What plane?
ghostyboyFeb 24, 2008
Debunkers are really reaching on his one. It's likew saying if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and it IS a duck then it MUST be a f**king stegosaurus.Here is a video of two pandas:<a class="user" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ufFT2BWh3BQ">http://youtube.com/watch?v=ufFT2BWh3BQ</a>Or so I thought! If you ignore enough evidence and common sense you can clearly see that the panda on the right is actually a progressive collapse due to debris and fire.
groovemasterFeb 24, 2008
If there was a "gouge" in the building, the building would have collapsed toward the gouge, and not symmetrically and straight down.For a symmetrical collapse to occur, as it did, it is an incontestable fact that all of the building's support columns must have failed at the exact same moment.If you genuinely believe that all of the building's support columns failed at the exact same moment due to fire and structural damage, I'm sorry to hear that you don't understand the most basic aspects of how the physical world works.
smotpokerFeb 24, 2008
1. 2001 != 2008. The Information Age has progressed, which is how and why Operation Northwoods has finally come to be public knowledge, which it should have been much sooner. Had it been known about in 2001, we might have been a little more critical of the government's analysis of 9/11 or, (assuming they are responsible) if it would have happened at all).2. Anyone who automatically dismisses everything from Wikipedia is a dumbass pretty much. Everyone knows peer-review is best methodology for research/development and information exchange. Wikipedia is simply an expanded/Open platform to facilitate that purpose. Posting other references besides Wikipedia is nearly always pointless/redundant because the best ones are usually right friggin' there!3. Name calling usually is bad, but you did come off a bit trite...4. It sorta did clarify in that it somewhat clarifies/justifies suspicion that people high in the government actually conceived of such manipulative plots Taken in conjunction with the fact that our government has already currently been caught in dozens of lies in the same time frame and continue to commit criminal acts publicly and it is sorta illogical claim they wouldn't do it because someone would find out when they went and killed/tortured a million people in front of the world based on fraudulent liesThat said, it isn't exactly proof, just evidence that they were capable and such things weren't (aren't?) unheard of
leesoongFeb 24, 2008
funny how passports survive a fireball the size of 6 stadiums, manage to fall clear of thousands of tons of crushed building bits, molten steel, and crispy body parts the size of bread crumbs, and are easily found be special agents - who moon light finding fairies and elves...Passports are made of PAPER ,Not Kevlar laminated Titanium plated diamond nanofibers...
moeblaksbrotherFeb 25, 2008
Oh, the NIST report on building 7 has finally been released?news to me.
lastvisibledogFeb 25, 2008
s**tForBrains.com
spaceman77Feb 26, 2008
Several whistle blowers say that the targets and the dates were known to some.Maybe a few leaks happened.
duggreenFeb 29, 2008
If the 'truth movement' is dying, why have the number of 9/11 related articles reffed on digg increased by double in the last six months? Why have entire countries like Italy and Japan become 'troofers' in the last three? If there's one thing certain, the twoof movement is gaining momentum by leaps and bounds, at least from the perspective of one who has been in it since day one.