nytimes.com— The federal government mistakenly made public a 266-page report, marked “highly confidential,” that gives detailed information about hundreds of the nation’s nuclear sites and programs.
Jun 3, 2009View in Crawl 4
I bet 99.9% of the people who now know about this would still not know had the NY Times simply not published this article. Do they not care about national security at ALL?How many times have they discovered a leak and publish it in a national newspaper? cause I've sure as hell lost count
This is worse than the nukes that were flown over the U.S. in a B52. The only bad thing that happened out of that was the U.S. broke some treaties. This is information about our nuclear weapons that our adversaries don't need to see. As for the Air Launched Cruise Missiles that were flown over the US, in order for them to blow up with a nuclear yield it would take a series of arming events to take place to allow detonation. If even 1 of the arming steps fail it would become a dud.
Why don't they do a flyover over ground zero and drop copies of this document over it as well?This is what inexperience and a lack of good old American common sense gets us. Change? Hmmm.
haikufuJun 3, 2009
Small ND towns don't have DQ. They have Tastee-Freeze, which for some reason everyone just calls "The Tit."
xman8Jun 3, 2009
Your health records are next! Change we can believe in.
aadyssJun 3, 2009
Living in fear depends totally upon you Mr.Coldheart. No on else.
goph09Jun 4, 2009
I bet 99.9% of the people who now know about this would still not know had the NY Times simply not published this article. Do they not care about national security at ALL?How many times have they discovered a leak and publish it in a national newspaper? cause I've sure as hell lost count
vatosplaceJun 4, 2009
WOW, I bet you have a double reinforced tin foil hat eh?
Closed AccountJun 4, 2009
Al Quieda! The really really no-noise terrorists.
sodadeJun 4, 2009
Yes - that's right. We were acting as England's lap dog.
combatsteve75Jun 5, 2009
This is worse than the nukes that were flown over the U.S. in a B52. The only bad thing that happened out of that was the U.S. broke some treaties. This is information about our nuclear weapons that our adversaries don't need to see. As for the Air Launched Cruise Missiles that were flown over the US, in order for them to blow up with a nuclear yield it would take a series of arming events to take place to allow detonation. If even 1 of the arming steps fail it would become a dud.
ronincharlotteJun 6, 2009
Why don't they do a flyover over ground zero and drop copies of this document over it as well?This is what inexperience and a lack of good old American common sense gets us. Change? Hmmm.