selfmademinds.com — "I thought it would be both interesting and fun to create a top 100 (or so) of the sites with the highest number of subscribers, as reported by FeedBurner. If you know of any large sites which are not on the list post in the comments."
Apr 23, 2007 View in Crawl 4
theixApr 23, 2007
Ummm where's the top 100 list? This is barely a top 20.
gameflyerApr 23, 2007
Damn, Engadget has 577K subscribers?!
mesoedApr 23, 2007
Too bad this guy didn't use the Feedburner API which is designed with this kind of thing in mind. The bottom 100 have only 1000 subs. NO WAY. Here an example of highest podcasts using FB API. <a class="user" href="http://www.podfeed.net/feedburner_rankings.asp">http://www.podfeed.net/feedburner_rankings.asp</a> Marked as inaccurate.
frant1cApr 23, 2007
Shameless plug: <a class="user" href="http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/24/top-40-sites-according-to-feedburner-stats/">http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/24/top-40-sites-according-to-feedburner-stats/</a>My own list, only top 40 but much more accurate (none of the sites in the top 40 have less than 10k subscribers). Of course, one has to bear in mind that these types of lists are completely unscientific as many publishers don't offer public feedcount for their FeedBurner feeds.
sciencebaseApr 23, 2007
If a site isn't showing feedburner stats but hasn't locked them down, you can still display their feedburner counter<a class="user" href="http://www.sciencetext.com/keep-your-subscriber-stats-secret.html">http://www.sciencetext.com/keep-your-subscriber-stats-secret.html</a>
civpercApr 23, 2007
Fkn a, not ALL sites are friggin' blogs.Btw, Arrington is an ass.
Closed AccountApr 23, 2007
looks like tech dominates on that list
neale64Apr 24, 2007
Awesome list good job
explainstuffJun 10, 2009
The next list will have <a class="user" href="http://www.explainstuff.com">http://www.explainstuff.com</a> Well yeah it is my site. But after reading the content I'm sure, no one would want to not follow it ;)