zeropaid.com — Will the RIAA, MPAA, and other copyright holders now be able to ask the courts for a warrant to snoop on suspected file-sharers and gather intelligence and incriminating information with which to build a case against them?
May 14, 2007 View in Crawl 4
mendeleev135May 15, 2007
in a way i see your point ... if you have nothing to hide. Because i guess it's not a problem ... BUT, i wonder how many people on Digg HAVE got something to hide heh. I think most people have, i do ...
kooblakhanMay 15, 2007
Please read the f**king article people. CALEA has been in place much longer that 2003. And its already imlemented on your mobile phone and landline. CALEA does not allow the tapping of business or domestic IP traffic, just voice and TELELCOM data (like the browser on your phone... and SMS). AND IT REQUIRES A WARRANT. The government cannot monitor your HTTP traffic. THIS IS JUST FOR TELECOM-BASED DATA, not broadband connections, DSL, or anything of the such. If you have VoIP, they can monitor your calls, just via the 'Central Office' of the VoIP provider, there is no way for them to wiretap your Broadband connection. It doesnt even let them on the network...Quit freaking out people.
pglowiakMay 15, 2007
If our elected officials backed the RIAA/MPAA, does that mean they get to download illegally for free????? Stranger things have been known to happen in DC.
meshilingMay 16, 2007
Yet another reason to encrypt everything.
stargatesteveMay 29, 2007
Canada has it's own problems. check out "fair access".