imgur.com— I say, it's not the photographer, it's the lens. Image and quote originally posted by Leo Laporte on Google Buzz.
Feb 20, 2010View in Crawl 4
That's the same lens I used to have. If I'm correct I'm pretty sure it's the 70-200 2.8(Aperture) IS(Image Stabilization). It runs at about $1400 for IS and $1200 for Non-IS. It shoots and works as well as it looks. I ended up selling her to pay my first/last/security for my house.www.flickr.com/timography....Cool story bro.
rorr.im says on their website that"If a user submits a comment with a link to <a class="user" href="http://rorr.im," rel="nofollow">http://rorr.im,</a> diggers following that link will be automatically redirected to our cached copy."and that's the reason i used it like that and sorry if i made it the wrong way. cheers.
theforelementsFeb 21, 2010
That's the same lens I used to have. If I'm correct I'm pretty sure it's the 70-200 2.8(Aperture) IS(Image Stabilization). It runs at about $1400 for IS and $1200 for Non-IS. It shoots and works as well as it looks. I ended up selling her to pay my first/last/security for my house.www.flickr.com/timography....Cool story bro.
nunloverFeb 21, 2010
image is gone
tymonerFeb 21, 2010
apparently, the page I'm looking for is in another castle.
antdudeFeb 21, 2010
<a class="user" href="http://rorr.im/digg.com/tech_news/they_say_it_s_not_the_camera_it_s_the_photographer_pic/" rel="nofollow">http://rorr.im/digg.com/tech_news/they_say_it_s_no ...</a> for those who block referrers.
Closed AccountFeb 21, 2010
It's a 70-200 on the end of a tele-converter. Not a 400 or 600.
emreerokyarFeb 21, 2010
rorr.im says on their website that"If a user submits a comment with a link to <a class="user" href="http://rorr.im," rel="nofollow">http://rorr.im,</a> diggers following that link will be automatically redirected to our cached copy."and that's the reason i used it like that and sorry if i made it the wrong way. cheers.