Bury this s**t, they should take their own advice, What the users want: ONE PAGE is what ALL users want.FTA: Usability testing asks: "How can I make it easy for customers once they're here?"A: Make it ONE page per article.
It might have been a good article for once............. BUT as soon as i clicked the link and saw "TECH RADAR" i closed it immediately. Maybe this should be a lesson that if they didn't post so many bulls**t time wasting useless articles people would possibly give more credit and time to the site. Instead they just get buried as another CRAP 2 paragraphs per page spread over 15 pages and BURIED and not even read. This what happens when you cry wolf too many times no body gives a flying f**k what happens to you when you really have something to say, they just wont give a s**t and wont listen.
Hi reformation, I wrote this article and I can tell you that this isn't made up. The source for the 1:10:100 ratio (which is fairly widely known in software engineering and web development) is "Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach.", Pressman R. (McGraw Hill, 6th Edition). <a class="user" href="http://www.rspa.com/about/sepa.html">http://www.rspa.com/about/sepa.html</a>As for the other commenters complaining about the usability of this article, I agree. I wrote it for a printed magazine which has syndicated it on to other sites. I have no control over how it's displayed on these sites and yeah, there's some pretty epic usability fail on some of them…
wildestNov 30, 2008
good guide, great topic
Closed AccountDec 1, 2008
It didn't say definitive. :)
nathan42100Dec 1, 2008
Best way to test your website:Make it good.Make it well.Put it on digg.
jkalDec 1, 2008
Bury this s**t, they should take their own advice, What the users want: ONE PAGE is what ALL users want.FTA: Usability testing asks: "How can I make it easy for customers once they're here?"A: Make it ONE page per article.
tigerdazDec 1, 2008
It might have been a good article for once............. BUT as soon as i clicked the link and saw "TECH RADAR" i closed it immediately. Maybe this should be a lesson that if they didn't post so many bulls**t time wasting useless articles people would possibly give more credit and time to the site. Instead they just get buried as another CRAP 2 paragraphs per page spread over 15 pages and BURIED and not even read. This what happens when you cry wolf too many times no body gives a flying f**k what happens to you when you really have something to say, they just wont give a s**t and wont listen.
cennyddFeb 4, 2009
Hi reformation, I wrote this article and I can tell you that this isn't made up. The source for the 1:10:100 ratio (which is fairly widely known in software engineering and web development) is "Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach.", Pressman R. (McGraw Hill, 6th Edition). <a class="user" href="http://www.rspa.com/about/sepa.html">http://www.rspa.com/about/sepa.html</a>As for the other commenters complaining about the usability of this article, I agree. I wrote it for a printed magazine which has syndicated it on to other sites. I have no control over how it's displayed on these sites and yeah, there's some pretty epic usability fail on some of them…