pol.moveon.org — This week, the Senate is planning to quietly hold a vote that would pardon President Bush for breaking the law by illegally wiretapping innocent Americans. So far, Democrats and some Republicans are holding strong against the bill, and there are good chances to stop it if enough of us speak up.
Sep 19, 2006 View in Crawl 4
greymaxcatSep 19, 2006
The real NWO<a class="user" href="http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wcw/nwohist.htm">http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrestling/pages/wcw/nwohist.htm</a>
greymaxcatSep 20, 2006
Bla Bla Bla
Closed AccountSep 20, 2006
Where do we go to stop this from happening?
Closed AccountSep 21, 2006
Post has been flagged as "innacurate"Instead of reading about what to think on moveon.org and kos,, why don't you actually listen to what he was saying.look up the definition of Jurisprudence,, and get a clue FFS
reportabuseSep 21, 2006
************ ABUSE ALERT ************The user above, diaboiickungfu (to you it looks like diabolickungfu), is impersonating a genuine user, Diabolickungfu. This impostor has impersonated other genuine Digg users as well. This impostor is breaking Digg's Terms of Use Agreement, Section 3.1 : <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/tos">http://digg.com/tos</a> .Please report this user by emailing this imposter's user name (please copy and paste for complete accuracy) and the URL of this thread to abuse@digg.com, and state in the email what you yourself see as the violation.If you see yourself being impersonated in a similar fashion, report it immediately to abuse@digg.com with all pertinent details.People who intentionally break Digg's Terms of Use Agreement will only serve to bring Digg down and lose its popularity among true Digg users. It is important that people like this are reported and stopped.Thank you.
damandohSep 22, 2006
In his latest book, Al Franken argues (full disclosure: I agree with him) that Bush has, in fact, committed an obvious and impeachable felony. He has violated Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment; not just once but on several occasions. Section 4 stipulates:"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. ..."On several occasions Bush has questioned, even downright refuted the "validity of the public debt of the United States" by calling Treasury bills -- the investment basis of the Social Security Trust Fund -- nothing but "I.O.U.s." He has since recanted by referring to T-bills as "sound investments" under his failed privatization plans.So Bush has not just committed millions of counts of felony fraud as well as potentially actionable warcrimes but he has also brought the full faith and credit of U.S. debts into doubt. Seems to me that a bipartisan Congress with an ounce of backbone could impeach him quite readily.While contemporary evidence suggests that Clinton cheated on his wife and lied to Congress about it, he has been impeached on that evidence. An impeachment is a legal trial proceeding with the whole Senatorial body acting as jury. Of those impeachment charges, however, he was acquitted. As far as I know, Clinton was never charged in civil courts. Under our legal system, that means William Jefferson Clinton, the 41st President of the United States of America, served his country legally and without further indictment....still glad he wasn't MY father, though.
damandohSep 27, 2006
Corvidae, after he left office, Nixon was pardoned by Ford. As far as I know, no charges were brought against him because all the charges that could have been filed were preempted by the pardon. It wasn't that Congress decided to cut Nixon a break because he stepped down, it's that the person who stepped into his office declared him "Safe!" immediately after being sworn into office.As for Clinton, he was charged, he was impeached, and he was acquitted. He finished his term in office without any further indictment. In fact, as far as I'm aware, Bill Clinton has not been further indicted on any other crime since he resumed being quite "touchable."There was only one other American President ever impeached, and as far as I know, he too was acquitted, but he summarily stepped down. So, I'm not sure to what historical occurrence you're referring to when you say, "...if a president is no longer in office, congress generaly drops the charges."