f**k that, you shouldn't be surfing the web at work anyways. i don't have an ounce of pity for people who receive unpleasant surprises by clicking on a link i posted when you knew damn well it might get you in trouble. stop breaking company policies, and stop complaining.
@pjdolandYour thinking too small...What if, like the writer hints at, browsers would implement some sort of global option that would filter all NSFW links? Then the HTML coder could put the attribute in there and if in the event that a person who has no interest in NSFW links happened across one it would never even show the link.Of course that is but one example of how it could be used in a positive way.@izzybombYou right it is not often that you run across a NSFW link in a mainstream article but if you did and didn't want to be exposed to such things wouldn't it be nice to have the option of having it automatically removed?
I wouldn't mind a script. Something that maybe bolded the link, and made it red, and appended NSFW to the link title or something. Or had a title Attribute of NSFW. I'd use it,
This is sooo lame and inaccurate. It's just defining REL, but many browsers doesn't translate it well, especially IE before IE 6 and Firefox before Firefox 1.5.If I want to exclude pornographic content, I just exclude it using PICS rating for explicit content. It's much usable.
Closed AccountDec 29, 2006
IS ANYONE INTERESTED IN A GREASEMONKEY SCRIPT? I can do it pretty quick!
electricheadDec 29, 2006
@nilobject: "content" ... :D
Closed AccountDec 29, 2006
As quick as pressing your caps lock key?
johnie1Dec 29, 2006
i use this ace style:<a class="user" href="http://userstyles.org/style/show/48">http://userstyles.org/style/show/48</a>when i hover over a link that links to a pdf it changes the mouse cursor to the Adobe icon, easy to implement. The possibilities for doing this on a NSFW link would be cool, maybe change the cursor into 3 Xs
Closed AccountDec 29, 2006
f**k that, you shouldn't be surfing the web at work anyways. i don't have an ounce of pity for people who receive unpleasant surprises by clicking on a link i posted when you knew damn well it might get you in trouble. stop breaking company policies, and stop complaining.
Closed AccountDec 29, 2006
No idea on the first post, as for the second one, "dugged" isn't a word.
ddosattackDec 29, 2006
@pjdolandYour thinking too small...What if, like the writer hints at, browsers would implement some sort of global option that would filter all NSFW links? Then the HTML coder could put the attribute in there and if in the event that a person who has no interest in NSFW links happened across one it would never even show the link.Of course that is but one example of how it could be used in a positive way.@izzybombYou right it is not often that you run across a NSFW link in a mainstream article but if you did and didn't want to be exposed to such things wouldn't it be nice to have the option of having it automatically removed?
giantapplecoreDec 29, 2006
I wouldn't mind a script. Something that maybe bolded the link, and made it red, and appended NSFW to the link title or something. Or had a title Attribute of NSFW. I'd use it,
damnmanDec 30, 2006
wow talk about over engineering something...
erikumaJan 2, 2007
This is sooo lame and inaccurate. It's just defining REL, but many browsers doesn't translate it well, especially IE before IE 6 and Firefox before Firefox 1.5.If I want to exclude pornographic content, I just exclude it using PICS rating for explicit content. It's much usable.