examiner.com — The infamous "hockey stick" temperature graph purporting to show a runaway acceleration in global temperatures beginning in 1850 was never accurate--and the Climatic Research Unit knew it wasn't accurate when they published it. A graph made from their own data tells the tale.
Nov 23, 2009 View in Crawl 4
3nder99Nov 24, 2009
@BerateBirthersI voted for Obama, and I think people like you are the problem with our country. You blindly listen to whatever your party tells you is fine. Okay. The fact that they refuse to publish the data for peer review by OTHER SCIENTISTS should be YOUR first CLUE that you have NO IDEA what you are talking about.
Closed AccountNov 28, 2009
China's pollution effects China. It's a small price to pay for the enormous economic boom they are having.There is absolutely no consensus that China's pollution is effecting the world.
matthewt69Nov 29, 2009
here is more detail about the so called fraud:"Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the 1980s a time when climate change was seen as a less pressing issue."this isnt about fraud, or lies or hoaxes - its old data that was stupidly discarded in the 80's when climate science wasnt a big deal
googlymoogly111Nov 30, 2009
" China's pollution effects China. It's a small price to pay for the enormous economic boom they are having.There is absolutely no consensus that China's pollution is effecting the world. "Soo what you're saying is cap'n trade is a scam right? Because it is...
kevincmntNov 30, 2009
Like you, I think most of us are just interested in seeing the data, understanding the context, listening to the debate and then making up our own minds. I believe the skeptics are actually more open to this than the believers. Have a look at www.wattsupwiththat.com and then the believer's site www.realclimate.com Takes a while to get up to speed but eventually you will begin to see a lot of material from both sides. Also read these summaries. From the skeptics point of view but again it is a start. <a class="user" href="http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/mclean/agwfallacies.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/p ...</a><a class="user" href="http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monthly_report/sppi_monthly_co2_report_october.html" rel="nofollow">http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monthly_report/s ...</a>cheers.