franticindustries.com — Everything in this world can be shown as a flowchart algorithm. This, of course, applies to the complex and not well researched field of ?Digg comments?. Here?s my humble attempt to define an algorithm which should encompass all of the many possibilities of comment development on Digg. Take this with your tongue firmly in cheek.
Jan 8, 2007 View in Crawl 4
diggomyeggoJan 9, 2007
Not as far down as I am!
polygoneJan 9, 2007
I love Mac, Linux, Wii!!!11!!11This is sooo liberal biased. Put on your tinfoil hats guys cause Kevin Rose is all conspiracy theory and he hates god.f**k Microsoft, Sony, Christianity, and iPods!!11!!!Why is six afraid of seven?Cause seven is less that eight!!!Digg me down if you really wanna digg me up....or down!!!Step 1: Get a root canalStep 2: Eat lots of Vicoden and read obscure postsStep 3: ?!?!?!?!?Step 4: Write off losses as donation<a class="user" href="http://www.myspace.com/ClickHereforSpam">http://www.myspace.com/ClickHereforSpam</a>
cglassJan 9, 2007
@megagram - You almost made me cry with laughter, almost. :-)
samsteJan 9, 2007
or not ay?
balsamlaneJan 9, 2007
YEA! I'm the first to ask "Will it blend?" Damn, say... grammar police, does the ? go inside the " or outside?
bigkittyJan 10, 2007
Good enough, as far as it goes, but here's a few he forgot:At least three or four "digg me down" comments from people who had trouble with the comment editor.A few more comments saying, "never mind, wrong thread."Someone ASKING to be "dugg down" because he wants to set a record for being dugg down the most times. But then, those comments are usually dugg UP.A few remarks about the "DIGG Effect" - followed by obligatory mention of DuggMirror.A comment containing a one-word anatomical reference and nothing else, followed by someone else's comment, "Welcome to my BLOCKED list!"A solipsistic DIGGer pronouncing the article, or the entire DIGG category, to be uninteresting, and expressing disbelief that such an article could have made the front page.And last but not least, a colorful remark from sockpuppets mentioning an imaginative scenario involving BigKitty, even though BigKitty had neither submitted that article nor entered any comments.