Come election day, you will be allowed to vote for the Full Twelve Inch Family Size s**t Sandwich, or for the Six Inch Value s**t Sandwich Special. Side order of fries with that?
You bring up a point that makes me think Bush and Clinton are in bed together, the strongest evidence being the 1992 election.Bush came back from the gulf war with like 80% approval. But in less than a year he dropped half of that by breaking his tax promise. Why the hell didn't he borrow it. That's like the only time a Bush has ever done that. And then as we all know the one game they do in politics is split the vote... Perot? (It's how Wilson got elected by the bankers to start the fed) Never before have they let a third candidate in like that, why? Those two parties would never do that unless it was for a reason. And then look at the Gore - Bush. In 1998 Clinton sitting at about 65% approval because people thought he as great for the economy but he gets himself caught in a lie he knew he'd get caught doing. And Clinton ignored several subpoenas, why didn't he ignore this one?Just some inconsistency's around those two make me wonder. Plus they are both big government, big spending, anti-civil liberty, fascists. They may disagree about this or that, but the end goal is the same plus it's much better to control your opposition.
Closed AccountOct 8, 2008
Come election day, you will be allowed to vote for the Full Twelve Inch Family Size s**t Sandwich, or for the Six Inch Value s**t Sandwich Special. Side order of fries with that?
akhomesteadOct 8, 2008
You bring up a point that makes me think Bush and Clinton are in bed together, the strongest evidence being the 1992 election.Bush came back from the gulf war with like 80% approval. But in less than a year he dropped half of that by breaking his tax promise. Why the hell didn't he borrow it. That's like the only time a Bush has ever done that. And then as we all know the one game they do in politics is split the vote... Perot? (It's how Wilson got elected by the bankers to start the fed) Never before have they let a third candidate in like that, why? Those two parties would never do that unless it was for a reason. And then look at the Gore - Bush. In 1998 Clinton sitting at about 65% approval because people thought he as great for the economy but he gets himself caught in a lie he knew he'd get caught doing. And Clinton ignored several subpoenas, why didn't he ignore this one?Just some inconsistency's around those two make me wonder. Plus they are both big government, big spending, anti-civil liberty, fascists. They may disagree about this or that, but the end goal is the same plus it's much better to control your opposition.
Closed AccountOct 8, 2008
"Evil of Two Lessors" - Chuck BaldwinVOTE THIRD PARTY! If in Doubt - Vote Them Out!<a class="user" href="http://www.voterbomb.com/2008/">http://www.voterbomb.com/2008/</a>
Closed AccountOct 8, 2008
I've eliminated three of the five from my personal life, but hardly know what to do about the other two.