thomas.loc.gov — That the House of Representatives--(1) recognizes Michael Jackson as a global humanitarian and a noted leader in the fight against worldwide hunger and medical crises; and(2) celebrates Michael Jackson as an accomplished contributor to the worlds of arts and entertainment, scientific advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, and global food securi
Jul 7, 2009 View in Crawl 4
comeonnowreallyJul 8, 2009
I wonder when Madoff dies will they give him something like this. Who cares he screwed over a ton of people, he was an accounting and investment WIZ!? He made more money quicker than most people ever make. He def needs something like this. While we are at it, maybe Dr.Dea....I mean Kavorician (?) can get this as well. Just think of the hundreds of people he helped pass on to a better place.
sockpuppetsJul 8, 2009
Thanks for the link, I buried it as spam.
gilbesJul 8, 2009
Yeah, because everyone one knows OJ was innocent and was found to be innocent in the crinmal court of law.Or was it that he was "not guilty", as in not enough to convict but he still f**king did it."Presumption of innocence" is a term that doesn't littereally mean everyone is always innocent of everything until they are proven guilty in a court of law. Not guilty is not the same as innocent.It is not a concept easily understood my the mentally challenged.f**king idiot, child rapist appologist douche bag.
gilbesJul 8, 2009
Don't get a head of yourself. I have never been accused in a court of law by dozens of children because I in fact have never done and never will do anything that disgusting.MJ on the other hand, had accusations and evidence of his gitter encrusted awfulness.
gilbesJul 9, 2009
Sorry, but you, and apparently many others, are way too simple minded about this stuff.According to me, not being found guilt in a court of law does not mean you did not do something. It means that the court can't convict you whether you did it or not.Micheal Jackson raped some kids, the court never said he did not. What they did say is that the prosecuition did not have enough proof. And they did not say that the prosection had no proof.
gcnaddictJul 9, 2009
Finally, someone with some sense.
seton1Jul 10, 2009
It is not the music for which I respected this man. Yes, I grew up in the 80's and it takes me down memory lane. However, it is his humanitarian efforts. The amounts of money and time he spent on these efforts was undeniable. As for the "allegations" that follow him, he was not convicted and for that case in which he settled, shame on that family for settling if something did happen. If the officials had enough evidence, they would have convicted him whether or not the family was willing to tesify. Lest we forget, in this country one is "innocent until proven guilty". I don't remember him being convicted of anything. None of us knows the facts. We only know what we have been told by the media which, frankly, has become something of a circus performance. And for those that are tired of hearing about him, then why the heck are you posting on this site. Just get off and do something else. You are giving credence the interest that many have with him.