ap.google.com — The Supreme Court appeared inclined Monday to rule that crime lab reports used in drug and other cases may not be introduced at trial without allowing defendants to cross-examine the forensic analysts who prepare them.
Nov 12, 2008 View in Crawl 4
fguyincNov 12, 2008Submitter
Imagine being accused of a crime, and your accuser doesn't have to show up to be cross-examined. They could just simply write a letter, and the court would accept it as uncontested testimony.
striker101Nov 12, 2008
At least it appears that the Supreme Court was thinking straighter that day.
Closed AccountNov 12, 2008
For once the black robed buffoons did something right.