news.yahoo.com — Scientists have made ordinary human skin cells take on the chameleon-like powers of embryonic stem cells, a startling breakthrough that might someday deliver the medical payoffs of embryo cloning without the controversy.
Nov 20, 2007 View in Crawl 4
bugglesNov 21, 2007
No, jackass, he canceled using MY tax dollars to do it with. You're free to use your own f**king money and fund whatever private sector human blender shop you wish. Dugg down for ignorance.
zeromancerNov 21, 2007
yeah. just think about all those potential human lives that are covering my furniture!
grungemusic3001Nov 21, 2007
wrong:sperm+egg+9months in the mothers womb=>baby
insomniac8400Nov 21, 2007
Controversy? This a joke. Currently stem cells are eggs stripped of their own genetic information fertilized with a skin cell. The resulting embryo doesn't fit the religious pro-life definition of new life because it doesn't involve a sperm cell and an egg. Honestly, it seems odd that the religious pro-lifers are even protesting embryonic stem cells. Maybe they are holding science back just to create controversy hoping to convince people to donate money to corrupt religious figures.
jcpahlNov 28, 2007
I don't know whether to be heartened that someone mentioned this or horrified that some f**kwits dugg you down.
jupiDec 4, 2007
People who say 'All the people who are saying this is not religious and it's moral are probably religious' probably don't get the difference
flamekebabFeb 15, 2008
@ cababika799"If you are responsible enough to be having sex, then you're responsible enough to take care of a child."That is such utter bollocks. That is your opinion, not fact. Responsibility and sex DO NOT go hand in hand at all, perhaps they should but they don't, saying they do does absolutely nothing to change the fact.
dudley9May 25, 2008
<a class="user" href="http://www.genericsmed.com/">http://www.genericsmed.com/</a><a class="user" href="http://www.generics.ws/">http://www.generics.ws/</a>