ecogeek.org — Solar is a highly efficient for heating water. Combining it with underground storage, and a year-round system can be created where the system can cover heating requirements in the winter and cooling in the summer.
Mar 8, 2008 View in Crawl 4
honestabeMar 8, 2008
It's not our fault your countries have confusing names. Geeeeez.
michelsonmorleyMar 8, 2008
There's nothing like this in Denmark. Instead, 20% of Denmarks power comes from wind energy (more then any other country), so let's applaud both the Danes and the Dutch.
strawgateMar 12, 2008
Not everyone has money to be constantly repairing roads, however I think GreyICE has a good point, the slowing thermal expansion and contraction would slow road decay, but im still not sure it's the greatest idea.
nillerusMar 22, 2008
Touché :)
mhmdkhamisJun 1, 2008
We all had ideas like this as kids. Then as we got older we learned more and realized they wouldn't really be viable. If this company has made the cliche solar-powered road into a viable solution, that's pretty rad, but I'm skeptical.<a class="user" href="http://girls.paramegsoft.com/">http://girls.paramegsoft.com/</a><a class="user" href="http://www.paramegsoft.com/">http://www.paramegsoft.com/</a>
afoxy21Feb 10, 2009
I don't care how "clean" nuclear energy gets - there's no way to really deal with the waste! And don't tell me all about how they're burying it safely underground -- that's just not sustainable over the long term.Clean energy is clean through it's entire life-cycle. Period.
doomgloomMar 2, 2009
Anyone who has ever had to slice vegetables knows: one sharp knife is better than infinity dull ones. To worry about nuclear "waste" is like worrying about how to discard a sharp knife when it loses its edge, because you're not allowed to sharpen it, because grindstones would cause sharp knife proliferation!