thinkprogress.org — QUESTION: Just a simple question: Are we winning?SNOW: We’re making progress. I don’t know. How do you define winning?The fact is, in taking on the war on terror — no, let me put it this way: The president’s made it obvious we’re going to win. And that means ultimately providing an Iraq that is safe, secure
Oct 16, 2006 View in Crawl 4
walterdirtOct 17, 2006
Thank you.If you want and agree with the war, sign up and fight, otherwise, SHUT THE F*CK UP, because who is the bigger coward; the guy who disagrees on prinicple to fight, or the guy who is all *ra-ra-ra killem sand n*ggers* but refuses to fight?/proud anti-war liberal
jon3kOct 17, 2006
At least we can all agree, right or left, that useless comments like this have no place on digg. Next time, as opposed to just whining and slinging mud, try adding something to the debate.You know, I might not always agree with everyone on here, but I have gotten an opportunity to at least hear from the other side of the isle, from moderate to extreme, and I really do appreciate that.
Closed AccountOct 17, 2006
@Jon3kYes. 3000 dead Americans, 600,000(?) dead Iraqis, thousands of newly invigorated terrorists, replacement of a brutal dictatorship with anarchy, nilhilism, civial war and ultimately a even more brutal theocratic dictatorship.We (by which I mean everyone with the exception of the Kurds) would have been better off with Saddam. We are responsible for far more deaths than he. Of Americans and Iraquis both.
dauntingOct 17, 2006
tens of thousands over the span of 20 years. Hundreds of thousand over the span of 3 years. Come on....
walterdirtOct 18, 2006
@jon3kActually I've made a few flyer's for use in protests you presumptuous cowardly windbag, why don't you go sign up to lick Bush's taint.
meadow113Oct 18, 2006
Can't argue, so you insult
asianwasteOct 18, 2006
Speak for yourself about arguing. Why don't you send your counterpoint instead of retorting with a redundant question? If not, I've got no time for you then.