"What is so difficult about this concept?"It's incorrect, for starters. I wish there was a way to require someone actually know what they were talking about before they open their mouth. Once again: For any photograph you save as PNG, I can produce a JPG with no perceptible loss of quality and the file size will be at least half. Take a look for yourself: original PNG = 5,602 KB JPG with no perceptible change in quality = 721 KB (<a class="user" href="http://picasaweb.google.com/jbaker6953/Misc/photo?authkey=jlbInhkJdUQ#5164093823806499362)">http://picasaweb.google.com/jbaker6953/Misc/photo? ...</a>
When submitter explains camera model, technique or the personal challenges to capture an "amazing" photo we could ensure a more positive response than Hands Down. Without documenting the source we fail to digg this submission.
pmosisFeb 7, 2008
Proof.
jamespurdyFeb 7, 2008
Lol this is the exact cover of my chemistry book
jerbakerFeb 7, 2008
"What is so difficult about this concept?"It's incorrect, for starters. I wish there was a way to require someone actually know what they were talking about before they open their mouth. Once again: For any photograph you save as PNG, I can produce a JPG with no perceptible loss of quality and the file size will be at least half. Take a look for yourself: original PNG = 5,602 KB JPG with no perceptible change in quality = 721 KB (<a class="user" href="http://picasaweb.google.com/jbaker6953/Misc/photo?authkey=jlbInhkJdUQ#5164093823806499362)">http://picasaweb.google.com/jbaker6953/Misc/photo? ...</a>
dano66Feb 7, 2008
Eiffel 65?
veryborednowFeb 7, 2008
Why the hell do you care douche?
mattsegalFeb 7, 2008
you are retarded
Closed AccountFeb 16, 2008
When submitter explains camera model, technique or the personal challenges to capture an "amazing" photo we could ensure a more positive response than Hands Down. Without documenting the source we fail to digg this submission.