archaeology.org — Newly developed techniques could make cloning Neanderthal cells or body parts a reality within a few years. This could unlock the answer to many question about our genetic makeup---and may be useful in researching medical treatments. But should it be done?
Apr 30, 2010 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountMay 1, 2010
do you found f**king monkeys atractive? you animal you ;)
zenith251May 1, 2010
@Aquileria - Ethics? Do you really want to talk ethics? The ethics of this proposed idea is to give life to a creature that will never exist again. Even if his existence is being generally grumpy and annoyed for most to all of his life, it's still something that he/she would have never had without us.
zenith251May 1, 2010
@carbonetc - Good. That would bring some progress to the scientific community and raise more questions as to the ethical treatment of animals. Hunting dolphins and whales, anyone? Poaching primates for whatever reason? All things that need to be stopped, immediately. Cloning and raising a neanderthal would bring even more attention to that cause.
jarninMay 1, 2010
See: <a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceman_%28film%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceman_%28film%29</a>
ismhmrMay 1, 2010
No.. They should not.They should clone gingers instead, because we all already know they do not have souls.
neonevermoreMay 1, 2010
See:<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encino_man" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encino_man</a>
frisbinatorMay 1, 2010
There no longer is any wild my friend.
zenith251May 1, 2010
"You're such an idiot" and "That's why you don't get it, dude..." do nothing to illustrate your point. Wait, do you even have a point?
enantiodromiaMay 2, 2010
trolly troll, trolly troll!/buried, reported